W. Virginia Bill Would Yank Your Driver's License if Your Kid Misses Too Much School
Filed under: In The News
Pull over, ma'am. No, you weren't driving too fast. Your kid is missing too much school. Credit: Getty
"Look at this note from school! Ten unexcused absences?! That tears it! Don't even think about going out with your friends this weekend. You just lost your driving privileges, Bucko!"
Sound familiar?
Actually, this is not the sound of you talking to your kids. It could be the sound of the state talking to you.
That is, if you happen to live in West Virginia.
The Parkersville News and Sentinel reports State Sen. Erik Wells has introduced a bill to yank your driver's license if your kid misses 10 or more days of school. You'd get a warning after the fifth unexcused absence.
The Democrat tells the News and Sentinel he knows this bill will go over about as well as Rush Limbaugh in a pole-vaulting contest. However, he wants to make a point.
"I think responsibility has to start somewhere, and it is the parents' responsibility as parents to put the welfare of their child first, and one of those aspects is to get the child to school," Wells tells the newspaper.
He adds perpetually absent kids should also lose their ability to participate in band, play sports or enjoy other extracurricular activities.
"There needs to be some consequences," Wells tells the News and Sentinel.
Yeah, maybe. But West Virginia's General Assembly has a lot of other issues nipping at its heels, the newspaper reports, including a bill adding five to 10 minutes to the school day. Lawmakers say this, too, will impress upon parents the importance of education.
All told, lawmakers have 2,000 bills staring at them this legislative session. Only 200, on average, become law. Wells tells the News and Sentinel he's not optimistic about his bill passing.
Nonetheless, he adds, he hopes his effort will spark discussion. It already has. The News and Sentinel reports West Virginia Education Association President Dale Lee supports the bill.
"I think that one of the things a parent owes to a child that they bring into this world is to provide an environment to make sure they're in school," Wells tells the News and Sentinel. "I just have a hard time, as a parent, seeing how a parent would neglect their child, and I do think it's neglect ... You are hampering that child's ability to succeed in life by keeping them out of school and that's a disservice to that child."
Bills don't always have to be signed into law to be effective, Wells tells the News and Sentinel. Sometimes it's enough that legislation -- even futile legislation -- is introduced to let people know that lawmakers are doing something.
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- LAW SCHOOL OR COPYCAT would'nt it be a difficult profession ( lawyer)if anyone could use your court case defense as plaintiff or defendant
- Is permission required from both parents in every state . to become a foster parent? are there name's changed; would i need a court order
- What's the penalty for falsley claiming relation to a person does it have to be for monetary gain or proven not just a social gesture










ReaderComments (Page 2 of 27)
1-11-2011 @ 9:02AM
Milehisnk said...People are idiots if they think this bill will do anything at all other than punish people for conditions out of their control. Instead of punishing the parents because the kid walks in one door and out the next door as soon as they get dropped off, why not do something so that the kids CAN'T leave, hmmm? It's not about the parents being bad parents, I love how judgemental people are, automatically assuming that because their child skips school, that they are bad parents, but anyone with half a brain would understand that even children have free will and the ability to make decisions conciously. Any congressman who thinks he can legislate free thought, free will away from a child is going to come to a rather abrupt realization that he's an awful legislator.
And yes, this is a liberal use of policy to enforce a conservative ideal. But which is worse...The conservative ideal that kids should be attending class without interruption, or the liberal ideology that because you are the government you can regulate any part of a persons life, up to and including tying two non-related skills together?
1-11-2011 @ 8:56AM
FrenchBlue367 said...@John Menuis: First of all, driving isn't a RIGHT, it's a PRIVILEGE. Enough said about that.
Second of all, just to indicate the reading comprehension of many of these complainers, the bill presented clearly states UNEXCUSED absences. Must that be explained? Not to someone who actually ATTENDED school.
Also, looking at some of the grammar and spelling of some of these posts, really, I think that most of these people missed more than 10 days of school in second and third grade to have such horrible communication skills. Typos, I understand, but most of these errors are spelling and grammar, not typos. The communication skills exhibited in these posts (mostly people complaining about this bill, imagine that) are poor at best. Perhaps this bill, in being presented, makes a very valid point. STAY IN SCHOOL. LEARN SOMETHING BESIDES HOW TO MAKE BABIES THAT YOU ARE NOT EQUIPPED (or can't be bothered) TO RAISE.
1-11-2011 @ 9:40AM
LN said...They tell you not to send your child to school if your child is sick. So if our child is coughing and feeling like crap we keep them home and pump them full of cold medicine and orange juice. Taking care of a cold is something we all know how to do. Also, a cold is something doctors can not cure. So why would we waste the money to visit the pediatrician for a cold. Yet with this law you would HAVE to visit the pediatrician. Because if you don't, then you have no proof that a missed day was excused.
And what about the parents who take their children on educational field trips? More than once I have taken my child out of school for a week to travel internationally. Would I lose my license for expanding my child's world view?
This is a terrible bill! It goes too far. West Virginia would become the official Nanny state. We don't need the bureaucracy telling us how we should raise our children. Take a good look at the child welfare and foster care system,,, they have already more than proven that government fails at taking care of kids.
1-11-2011 @ 10:04AM
ray66 said...do you know the cost to take your kids to the doctor for just a cold or flu just to here them say its just something going around.even with insurance it can be quit costly.and would you like me to send them to school sick and get your kid sick or others wich is where they may have got sick from in the first place.if parents would we sick kids at home less kids would be getting sick and have to miss school.
1-11-2011 @ 10:07AM
Tammy said...Duane, this is a democrat trying to push this law. Besides, when did it become a political issue. It's about school absentees and parents paying the price.
1-11-2011 @ 11:36AM
ecj100 said...Yes, it is limited to unexcused absences, as so many seem to miss. But that too has consequences. The other day, my daughter didn't feel well and stayed home, but we thought she could try to go and so did not send in an excuse, leaving her to face any consequences. If we might have lost a license we damn sure would have given her an excuse no matter what.
1-11-2011 @ 1:08PM
flash said...The Gov. needs to look at the damage their butting in has already caused. They took away the parents right to spank (not beat) their children. A lot of those children are teens and are hitting their parents,stealing their parents cars and hang out in the streets instead of going to school. They could care less if their parents has to pay a fine,go to jail because of what they are or are not doing.
When those same kids end up in front of a judge, he could care less about how that law has affected a parents power. The blame shifts right back to you. Parents need to do what the youtube Uncle did...Whoop that behind and regain control as a parent. I typed in "angry uncle beats teen" if you want to see the video.
1-11-2011 @ 8:38PM
thinker2255 said...The bill is refering to UNEXCUSED absences. The question is, who defines an unexcused absence and how does an absence become excused? By a letter from the parents? It seems to me the idea behind the proposed bill is simply to help prevent kids from being able to skip school and sneek around without their parents knowing. If they are skipping school, what are they doing? Being babysat by a drug lord or sitting in a mall sucking coffee? Much better for a kid to be babysat at school then out on the streets. And the point of this bill, from the reported proposer in the first place, is to get parents from neglecting their kids.
1-11-2011 @ 6:19AM
larryk70 said...This law is so ridiculous, the only people to comment so far are the spammers.
Reply
1-11-2011 @ 6:25AM
Rayje said...An interesting idea however, I can forsee some unusual cercomstances that will make such a law unworkable for every parents life situation. Problems and confusions could arrise.
Reply
1-11-2011 @ 6:26AM
salesman said...At first blush, I am completely opposed to anything that attempts to supercede my role as parent, or anything that increases Govt in my life. However, sadly there are parents that dont give a damn, or are lousy parents that dont know right from wrong, or just want to be friends to their kids and dont have the balls to stand up to them and tell them to get their butts into school everyday. So, if this helps get kids into schools by holding those parents accountable, then so be it. Shame that irresponsible behavior by some people effects us all.
Reply
1-11-2011 @ 9:47AM
LN said...You said it yourself... you are opposed to a law that interferes with YOUR right to parent. Well then, what gives you the right to interfere in Someone Else's right to parent. Exactly, nothing does. Just because you don't agree with how someone raises their children... you don't have the right to stick your nose in their business. The exception being, of course, if a minor is being abused.
1-11-2011 @ 6:31AM
plumgirl59 said...This bill addresses UN excused absences. So, if your student is ill or another valid reason is given - those days are not part of the 10 days in question. I am assuming that the law is referring to an absence without a note or even an absence due to an extended vacation that would count toward the 10 days. I believe that 10 unexcused is a bit strict, but a student DOES need to be in school in order to learn. I am sure in trying to reign in the chronic absentee kids (and negligent parents), they will also have situations that will backfire.
Reply
1-11-2011 @ 6:58AM
brina8106 said...All of my children's absences are excused by doctor and home notes but when my son reached 5 days I got a letter telling me to expect a call from the county Truancy officer to discuss why my child has missed so many days and that if he were to miss anymore I could be held accountable. It is BS that they threaten parents with these things. The only thing that is going to happen if this law is passed is parents are going to be losing their license end up on State assistance and the poverty level will dramatically increase. I get it parents who don't care need to be held accountable for their children missing so much school because without an education children will get no where in life.
1-11-2011 @ 9:35AM
melblev1226 said...I hate to break it to you but notes from home are not excused anymore. At least not in Ohio. The only thing that counts is a Dr. excuse. My co-pay for a Dr. appointment is $30. I am on a budget and I do not want to wast $30 for every cold or upset stomach. According to the school law here I have to or I will have truancy called on me. You are being judgmental by saying I am a bad parent if my kid misses 10 days of unexcused of school, but wouldn't it make me a worse parent if I sent my kid to school vomiting or diarrhea? Maybe you should ask questions before you judge. Unexcused does not all always mean skipped school.
1-11-2011 @ 3:29PM
dougalcandy said...10 unexcused absences are excessive? In addition to excused absences? How many days should a child be allowed to miss in a school year? Myown children rarely missed more than 5 days a year, I as a child usually missed 5-8 days a year. Anything past ten days absence should be considered excessive absence, unless of course there is a serious illness or extenuating circumstances.
1-11-2011 @ 6:30AM
oldinohio said...THIS SO WRONG!!! WE ARE BEING TAKEN OVER BY THE FEDERAL, STATE & LOCAL GOVT!!!!!
THERE WILL BE ANOTHER REVOLT WITHIN THIS COUNTRY IF THIS MESS IS ALLOWED TO CONTINUE!!! WAKE UP AMERICA...
WHAT'S NEXT, A NATIONAL ID CARD????
Reply
1-11-2011 @ 7:07AM
DAWN said...IF PARENT'S WOULD STOP BEING SO LAZY AND HOLD THEIR KIDS ACCOUNTABLE THEY GOV'T WOULD NOT HAVE TO STEP IN! I SAY IF YOU WANT TO LET YOUR KIDS GROW UP KNOWING NOTHING FINE, BUT DON'T LOOK TO MY TAX DOLLARS TO FEED YOUR KIDS! AND DON'T COMPLAIIN BECAUSE YOU ONLY MAKE MINIMUM WAGE!
1-11-2011 @ 8:44AM
john and peggy said...You are so wrong! My son was a handful, I brought him to school and put him in charge of the principal, he took off before he hit homeroom! Blame that on ME-NO! he was out of control and needed help. He got it and now is a great dad of my 2 grandgirls!
1-11-2011 @ 10:30AM
John Menuis said...Of my three sons the only one that did well in life was my youngest who dropped out in 10th grade and try as I might to see that he arrived at school he would leave in mid day. He is now very successful in his own business and will make far more than I have. It shows that it is as easy to stay out of school and learn something as it is to go to school and learn nothing. School is not the only place one can learn. Ever heard of books?