Hot on HuffPost Parents:
PHOTO: Virgin Mary Figure Appears With Child Battling Leukemia
Babble.com: 8 Parenting Lessons To Learn From 'Arrested Development'
New Guidelines Would Make School Lunches Healthier
Filed under: In The News, Mealtime, Nutrition: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Nutrition: Big Kids, Nutrition: Tweens, Nutrition: Teens
New federal standards could have your kids eating healthier at school. Credit: AP
The Agriculture Department proposal applies to lunches subsidized by the federal government and would be the first major nutritional overhaul of school meals in 15 years. It is expected to be announced Thursday.
The guidelines, which were obtained by The Associated Press and confirmed by USDA, would require schools to cut sodium in those meals by more than half, use more whole grains and serve low fat milk. They also would limit kids to only one cup of starchy vegetables a week, so schools couldn't offer french fries every day.
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said the new standards could affect more than 32 million children and are crucial because kids can consume as much as half of their daily calories in school.
"If we don't contain obesity in this country it's going to eat us alive in terms of health care costs," Vilsack said Wednesday, prior to the release of the guidelines.
While many schools are improving meals already, others are still serving children meals high in fat, salt and calories. The new guidelines are based on 2009 recommendations by the Institute of Medicine, the health arm of the National Academy of Sciences.
The announcement comes just a few weeks after President Barack Obama signed into law a child nutrition bill that will help schools pay for the healthier foods, which often are more expensive.
The subsidized meals that would fall under the guidelines proposed this week are served as free and low-cost meals to low-income children and long have been subject to government nutrition standards. The new law for the first time will extend nutrition standards to other foods sold in schools that aren't subsidized by the federal government, including "a la carte" foods on the lunch line and snacks in vending machines. Those standards, while expected to be similar, will be written separately.
The announcement is a proposal, and it could be several years before and schools are required to make changes.
The new USDA guidelines would:
- Establish the first calorie limits for school meals.
- Gradually reduce the amount of sodium in the meals over 10 years, with the eventual goal of reducing sodium by more than half.
- Ban most trans fats.
- Require more servings of fruits and vegetables.
- Require all milk served to be low fat or nonfat, and require all flavored milks to be nonfat.
- Incrementally increase the amount of whole grains required, eventually requiring most grains to be whole grains.
- Improve school breakfasts by requiring schools to serve a grain and a protein, instead of one or the other.
Some school groups have criticized efforts to make meals healthier, saying it will be hard for already-stretched schools to pay for the new requirements. Some conservatives, including former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, have charged that telling children what to eat is a case of government overreach.
Vilsack says he understands the new standards may pose some challenges for school districts, but he believes they are necessary. He compares obesity and related diseases like diabetes to a truck barreling toward a child, and the new guidelines are like a parent teaching that child to look both ways before he or she crosses the street.
"You want your kid to be able to walk across the street without getting hit," he says.
According to the USDA, about a third of children 6 to 19 years old are overweight or obese, and the number of obese children has tripled in the past few decades.
The Agriculture Department also is planning to release new dietary guidelines for the general public, possibly as soon as this month. Those guidelines, revised every five years, are similarly expected to encourage less sodium consumption and more grains, fruits and vegetables.
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. This article was written by MARY CLARE JALONICK, Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.











ReaderComments (Page 1 of 4)
1-18-2011 @ 6:51AM
Carolyn Berg said...It's about time this happened, get rid of vending machines also, healthy food can be tasty if it is cooked correctly. When I was a child we had good food in our school cafeteria and that is all we got during the day so therefore we ate it. We did not have vending machines and junk at school. Who ever came up with the idea of putting vending machines in schools anyway?
Reply
1-18-2011 @ 9:56PM
Susan said...Odds are that the idea of vending machines in schools came from some big company like Coca-Cola or Pepsi. I was shocked the first time I saw a vending machine in our son's school. Mostly pop/soda, no juice and a single row of water.
1-18-2011 @ 11:21AM
mike said...Ms. Berg....let me give you a brief education....vending became an intricate part of school systems because of the huge commissions they returned to each school when parents voted against any tax increases and school budgets were cut...secondly, you can be negative about vending however; they provide nutrician when linked with the JOHN C. STALKER INSTITUTE of nutrician for vending and schools lunch programs...BUT LIKE MOST MANDATES AND STUDIES, they simply state facts but overlook obvious factors/ reasoning....that being the unaffordability of school lunches if their guidelines are followed. AS AN EXAMPLE...it is suggest more fresh fruits and vegatables....well, here is a reality...school lunch programs now work/affordable because most of the food is frozen and their is next to nothing for waste...WHAT WOULD YOU DO WITH FRESH FRUITS AND OTHER THINGS, when they have to be tossed because they have spoiled ?? As soon as you throw things away, the cost/lost has to be built into what you sell...this will raise prices of lunches and kids will not be able to afford them.....Secondly, KIDS DON'T EAT FRUIT AND VEGATBLES AT HOME....what would make you think they will eat them at school ??BUT THERE IS ANOTHER FACTOR...most family have 2 parents working...when the kids come home from school, it's eat as they please with no parental guidance.
1-18-2011 @ 1:20PM
meg said...Our school PTA stepped up about 2 years ago and demanded a change. Today they do not have a nacho bar but a potatoe bar. They do not order Domino's pizza anymore but make them on whole grain crust. Whole mil out shim in (in bio bottles!) Granted my boy has never eatan the school lunch so he is packed great meals from home! If I miss a day I know he is not eating crap!
1-18-2011 @ 2:09PM
kris said...well mike, you could take the fresh veggies and fruits not sold to the hunger centers.. why would you throw them away? or maybe they could make them into frozen smoothies...
1-18-2011 @ 7:07AM
bruce williams said...Requiring changes to a much healthier menu in public schools will help the fight against childhood obesity, but one of the main reasons that there has been a three-fold increase in obesity among children over the past few decades is a direct result of the huge number of children that go directly from school, home to park themselves in front of computers and the television instead of burning off large amounts of calories through after school play, either organized sports or play among groups of kids. Kids don't play much any more. Maybe they can't because the streets and playgrounds are not safe any more.
Reply
1-18-2011 @ 7:24AM
BRI said...You are right. Neither of my children are even close to obese, my son is an athlete and my daughter who is 12 is just very thin and active. The government should not be telling me what my children can eat.That is up to the parents. My son has a hamburger 3 times a week at school, changing that to a salad does nothing for children like him except make him not eat which leads to headaches and poor concentration. I can see grades 1-5, but middle school and beyond, these kids should know what they can and cannot eat. Mine both do.
Even if they cannot play outside you can be active indoors, my chidren run all over with the dog and play inside when it's too cold out or there is "nothing" to do anymore outside. It's all what you make it.
1-18-2011 @ 7:24AM
BRI said...Not all children like what can be packed from home, i.e., cold lunches. I have two children, one will only take lunch that I make her at home, and my son only wants hot lunch. He doesn't like cold cuts, peanut butter, egg or really any sandwich. He doesn't like cold soup even in a thermos. I have tried everything. It costs me abouy $25.00 weekly for his lunch. So you can't put every child into the same boat!
Reply
1-18-2011 @ 7:23AM
Bogey said...Bunch of bull, especially if the parents don't follow this at home! And most don't!
Reply
1-18-2011 @ 7:29AM
Bogey said...Wow!
Reply
1-18-2011 @ 7:31AM
Monica said...Being a vegitarian back in the 90's as a school student, all I had to choose from was "salad" (one scoop of lettuce) or yogurt...everyday!!
This was long overdue.
Reply
1-18-2011 @ 7:32AM
Rich said...While providing healthier food is a step in the right direction, there are so many other factors to consider. There has been a substantial amount of study done on High Fructose Corn Syrup, and I am convinced that it is not the same as cane or beet sugar. When did Type II Diabetes begin its upward climb? Approximately 30 years ago, about the time HFCS entered our foods and drinks. Secondly, all the diet drinks have been proven to increase people's appetite. Drink plenty of diet drinks, and you are very likely to eat more food.
All of our problems cannot be attributed to any single factor. However, today so many of our foods are processed with ingredients that most of us cannot even pronounce. I highly doubt most of them are good for us. Last of all, kids are not getting the exercise they used to. Kids don't go outside and play or run around like they used to. If they really want to do something at the school level that would help reduce the obesity problem, then make phys ed classes mandatory every day of the school year for every child. Let them play dodge ball and all the sports and games that make kids actually assert themselves physically, because many parents do a terrible job of making sure their kids actually get the exercise they need.
And yes, I do somewhat know what I'm talking about. My kids eat a balanced diet, and they are involved in sports year round. They are both very healthy and they are not even close to being considered overweight. As for myself, I'm 47 years old, 5'7, and I weigh 140 lbs. We have an obligation to future generations to turn this obesity problem around. Schools need to take a bigger role, but so do parents.
Reply
1-18-2011 @ 7:39AM
Rich said...Many parents believe that it is not as safe today as it was 30 years ago. These are parents who have become mesmerized with horrific stories of child abductions in our 24/7 news world. But the fact is that our kids are safer today than 30 years ago, and this is a fact. Crime statistics support this. Parents need to let their kids go outside to play.
Reply
1-18-2011 @ 8:25AM
mberry said...Its not just about obese children its about teaching children healthy life styles. Just because you child might be thin doesnt mean they are healthy. Wake up AMERICA this is the best thing to happen for our children and future grandchildren.
Reply
1-18-2011 @ 8:07AM
Lynn said...This is not the best thing to happen for our kids in America in a long time. It borders on the plain stupid. EXERCISE is what kids need and plenty of it. Since the invention of video games and such they do nothing but sit. Sit in class, sit in front of the tv. Sit on the bus. The only time they walk is changing class. It really doesn't matter what you eat as long as you exercise enough. It is PE that should be required everday. Instead of spanish or german or french. What good is speaking a foreign language if you are so fat you can't walk across the room. Not all kids play basketball.
1-18-2011 @ 7:46AM
boiz said...Require all milk served to be low fat or nonfat, and require all flavored milks to be nonfat.
Great idea! Now most kids won't drink any milk at all for lunch!
Reply
1-18-2011 @ 7:50AM
Pam said...I am currently a cook at an elementary school. The government can make all the rules they want but if the kids won't eat it ,it doesn't make any difference.
Reply
1-18-2011 @ 8:16AM
Lynn said...EXACTLY! My mother was a school cook for 25 years. You should hear her comments about what kids won't eat. And 25 years ago school lunches were pretty much homecooked meals. All the salt, pepper and butter you wanted. And we were healthy. Has nobody read the research that says that whole milk is good for men? Evidently the fat they remove in 2% and lowfat is needed by men to keep the prostate healthy. Ever wondered about the spike in this disease. My kid drinks whole organic milk it is expensive, but if I'm gonna spend a few extra dollars on something it will be this. It is rich and creamy and sweet not watered down and full of antibiotics and steroids. I personally quit drinking milk when they destroyed the taste by giving cows this drugs that made them produce more milk. That stuff messes with womens reproductive systems also. If they want to change that is actually good all foods should be organic in schools.
1-18-2011 @ 9:30AM
Giselle said...You're the only one here that makes any sense at all--and that includes the government types.
3-13-2011 @ 6:38PM
Cheryl said...If we teach our kids at a young age about nutritional foods and healthy eating habits than the food won't be thrown away, because it will become the norm. We also need to push parents to have healthier eating habits at home, maybe we should be educating the parents.