Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Rev. Susan Baller-Shepard: Wild And Precious Lives: Godspeed…
27 Fantastic Books For Kids Of All Ages
SmackDown: Should Teachers Be Allowed to Blog About Their Students?
Filed under: Opinions

Act up in class, read about it in tomorrow's teacher blog. Illustration by Dori Hartley
Blogging About Your Students Is Not a Fireable Offense
by Amy Hatch
After venting about her students online, a teacher could be expelled from her job.
Natalie Munroe was escorted out of Central Bucks East High School last week after some students discovered what Munroe thought was a private blog.
The teacher says she never thought to protect her website with a password -- after all, her only readers were friends and family, and the majority of her posts dealt with her private life. But a brief series of personal essays on the state of education and her high school English students set the suburban Philadelphia school abuzz last week.
In her posts, Munroe frequently used profanity and suggested that some of her students dressed like street-walkers, over-estimated their intellectual prowess, and called them "rat-like" and "rude, lazy, disengaged whiners."
Now, Munroe is in danger of being fired for publishing her opinions online, PhillyBurbs.com reports, despite the fact that her lawyer, Steve Rovner, tells the news organization the Central Bucks school district does not have an "Internet policy."
Firing Munroe would be wrong, plain and simple.
Was what she did naive? Yes. The Internet is a public forum, after all. Was it indiscreet? Perhaps. But was it against the law? No.
What Munroe did, in fact, was her fundamental right as a United States citizen. She exercised her First Amendment right to express any opinion, no matter how unpopular, unpleasant or vile.
The Internet has opened a whole new frontier when it comes to the public expression of our opinions. Self-publishing has given rise to a whole new generation of voices, voices that otherwise may have never been heard. Voices that would have been otherwise disenfranchised. Voices that brought into the sunlight issues that were previously buried in the dark.
Take Heather Armstrong, another blogger who was fired for sharing her opinions about her employer on her uber-popular blog "Dooce."
Armstrong also used her blog as a forum to write about her private battle with depression, which landed her in the hospital for several days when her daughter was just an infant. Her willingness to open up about that experience helped raise the profile of clinical and post-partum depression, especially among the population that often experiences it -- mothers.
As a parent, I completely understand the instinct toward outrage. Would I be furious if a teacher insulted my child in a public online forum? You bet your bippy I would.
But as a journalist who makes her living from writing online, I shudder at the thought that Munroe might be terminated from her job for expressing her personal opinions on her personal blog.
And, let's be frank: Our educational system really is in crisis. Why is it so terrible that someone who sees it from the trenches should share her concerns and questions, profanity and acerbic commentary aside?
If Munroe is fired, a dangerous precedent will be set. The Internet is a powerful medium, one that certainly has its dark corners, but also one that has the potential to create conversations about subjects that affect us in the most fundamental ways.
Silencing those voices? Now, that would be worthy of expulsion.
A Lesson for Blogging Teachers: Actions Have Consequences
by Jessica Samakow
We see it again and again. An Internet scandal erupts and it's always the same defense: "I didn't think anyone would see it."
From teen sexters to Congressmen posting their pictures on Craigslist, the guilty parties all play the victim, acting surprised when their dirty laundry is aired across the Web.
Now, high school teacher Natalie Munroe could lose her job for negatively blogging about her students. Following the pattern of those under fire before her, she says "her blog was never meant to be widely read," USA Today reports.
OK, so maybe she didn't intend for her students to discover her blog, but that's simply not a viable defense. If something is posted on the Web, someone will find it.
High school teachers and counselors often remind teens how powerful the Internet is, noting that colleges now evaluate not only formal applications, but a student's online presence, as well. The general rule they tell teens: Don't post anything on the Internet you wouldn't want the world to see or read.
And, now that a Google search can be performed from your cell phone and Facebook is so easily accessible, this advice is both crucial and obvious. So, then, if teens are expected to take certain precautions on the Web, why shouldn't their teachers be held to the same standard?
This isn't a matter of free speech. True, we can say what we want in this country, but that doesn't mean we don't have to face consequences. A teen who rants on Facebook about how many shots of tequila she consumed last Saturday night deserves to get busted by her parents. An employee who tweets about his evil dictator of a boss will likely get reprimanded, if not fired.
And a teacher who blogs that her students "dress like streetwalkers" and have an "unrealistically high perception of (their) own ability level" should be penalized, as well.
Students tend to be intrigued with the lives of their teachers outside of school. Running into a teacher at the movie theater is like an out-of-body experience; shouldn't they be at home grading papers?!
Today's teachers probably felt the same way when they were in high school, but, instead of chance run-ins at the grocery store, students can just go to Google to learn more about their educators.
Munroe argues that her blog was not "stumbled upon" by students; it was "dug up." How it was discovered, however, is irrelevant. What matters is that it was found.
Look, I get that a frustrated teacher might turn to writing as an outlet to complain about her bratty high school students. But why not keep a journal? Or privately e-mail her closest friends? Posting it on a live blog, even with minimal subscribers, is just foolish.
In a recent post, Monroe defends her actions: "Contrary to what seems to be popular belief, I didn't -- and don't -- feel negatively toward all students. As I mentioned in another blog that nobody chooses to talk about, there were delightful students in school, too."
And while the so-called "delightful" students may appreciate her remarks, that doesn't make up for what was said about the not-so-delightful ones. I don't classify myself as being overly sensitive, but I would feel extremely uncomfortable being in a classroom and knowing my teacher pegged me as "rat-like" or "frightfully dim."
The students who were called these names deserve better.
View more videos at: http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com.










ReaderComments (Page 1 of 12)
2-16-2011 @ 2:38PM
Mommy@15 said...this is really good i mean people shouldnt be blogging in school in the first place us kids cant get onto facebook or that other stuff so y should the teachers. thats just my opinion.
Reply
2-19-2011 @ 3:24AM
RRRR said...It's interesting that none (at least none that I've seen so far) of the objections to what this teacher wrote actually address the accuracy of her post. Putting it on the internet may not have been wise, or perhaps it could have been expressed more constructively. (Since it was taken down, I'll probably never know. But look at your own post. You're a mother, yet your own writing suggests you are incapable of writing an error-free sentence. Perhaps English is not your primary language, in which case you have an excuse-- otherwise, you have none. The number of Americans who have not mastered their own language is appalling, and it seems likely that the source of her frustration was students who were too mentally lazy to write well, or even behave well. Instead of coddling underachievers, we need to raise the bar. Too many school districts do not give teachers sufficient authority to discipline their kids. As someone with over a decade of teaching experience, I can confirm everything about her post of which I am aware. This woman should not be punished for telling the truth, and I doubt she would have been so frustrated if she didn't care.
2-15-2011 @ 2:59PM
John said...I can't believe she hasn't been fire yet, is this a joke?
Reply
2-15-2011 @ 6:04PM
erica said...omg get over it she has every right 2 free speech...also kids these days are out fo control and most parents are st fault ..it starts at home
2-15-2011 @ 7:03PM
darden said...fired for what, you probably are the parent of one of the aforementioned monsters
2-15-2011 @ 7:28PM
quintanuba said...As long as the teacher(s) doesn't use students real names I see nothing wrong with it. I also work with school children in the transportation department. Parent's, if you really want to know how your children act, speak, and socialize, then I suggest you get in touch with your school board and ask that since the schools already have video cameras throughout, including the caffeteria, playgrounds/study halls and on the bus ride to and from school - to start airing the tapes on your local school channel. Then lets see if you can handle how your children really are out of your sight and ears. lol.. I give the teacher credit for pointing out facts that some parents can't accept or refuse to see. I also know the neighborhood school district very well, and yes parents, some of your children are spoiled brats. I am still amazed at how many kids, even high school aged, can't walk to the Bus Stop? lol..
2-15-2011 @ 8:44PM
Shannan said...Blogging about anything is your right. Now, if you were to perhaps list names of minor children in your blog, then I do not agree with that. Did she say their actual name? Or just refer to them as a "student"?
2-16-2011 @ 9:55AM
Michele said...As long as she doesn't refer to your child by name, it's her first amendment right. When she ridicules your child by name then she has crossed the line. It won't hurt any of those children to know they are whiney and need to take responsibility and possibly seeing it in print will help. Maybe your problem is that you see the description a little too close to home?
2-16-2011 @ 1:14PM
cara budaj said...Why in the world would this woman be fired???? I think we should commend her for being honest and stating the painfully obvious! Her blog was private in information. No disclosing where she worked or students names, so what's the problem. The district is way off the mark on this one. I graduated from East, and I am a parent to Central Bucks students. I say put her on a committee to improve the problems with student behavior, and involve the parents in educating your children on what is expected of them. Let's work together to raise prideful, respectful, good human beings!!!
2-15-2011 @ 3:28PM
John said...This teacher did not mention any students name.
Reply
2-15-2011 @ 5:01PM
tara said...That way my thought too. She didn't mention names, so what is the problem? Is she not allowed to express her frustrations that, considering the state of our educational system today, are likely well founded? To fire someone for this is pretty ridiculous, especially when we have documented cases of pedophiles in the NY teacher pool who cannot be fired because of the NEA (teachers union), so they are paid to sit in a room all day while someone else is paid to teach their class. At least THIS teacher, though frustrated, seems to care enough to BE frustrated. She sounds like one who NEEDS to be in the classroom, not removed from it.
2-15-2011 @ 5:15PM
Abigail said...Just because she didn't write names, doesn't mean kids didn't know who she was talking about. I know people that looked at the blog and said "I am nearly 100% sure she is talking about me right there". And even if she didn't say a specific student, she mentioned the name of the principal and fellow teachers. Plus, calling any student a "rude, 'beligerent' argumentive f*ck" is just awful, no matter if she said which student.
2-15-2011 @ 5:35PM
Kathie said...AbigailAbigail said...
Just because she didn't write names, doesn't mean kids didn't know who she was talking about. I know people that looked at the blog and said "I am nearly 100% sure she is talking about me right there". And even if she didn't say a specific student, she mentioned the name of the principal and fellow teachers. Plus, calling any student a "rude, 'beligerent' argumentive f*ck" is just awful, no matter if she said which student.
What if the student IS rude, beligerent and argumentative f*ck? If they knew she was talking about them, then they probably are. lol
2-15-2011 @ 7:13PM
Privacyand said...That is one person's opinion.
If she even mentioned my child, if I had one, in a positive or negative light, I would sue the ******* profanity out of her: Libel
I grew up in a home of educators. I guess they were professionals. They never spoke of any particular students.
That may have been just basic old fashion respect.
I gather, from what I read, there is too little of that in today's class room.
How about this? Just like jury duty we should all take a part of a day to visit our local school. We would see what is really going on. It would not have to be mandated. It would be good to know more about how our tax dollars are being spent.
However, this does not get us close to the "power" base; the administrators. I believe it is more them than the teachers who have destroyed our public schools.
This is what really concerns me. They,( The Federal Govt), wants to hire, fire, pay, teachers on "performance." Who is going to make the decisions? There is no real objective method. So what will we have? It will be a gang of administrators, perhaps stupid, canning the best teachers because they don't like them on a personal level.
2-15-2011 @ 3:29PM
silverwolf sweetheart said...why should she be fired she was doing what many people do venting about her day is our society so insuffralbly stupid and ignorant that we can't vent about what stresses us out? so what if she used profane language it's her right now if she used the names of those students then i would have a problem she shouldnt be fired she's just acting like a normal human being
Reply
2-15-2011 @ 3:31PM
oddtuning said...She didnt say any names so she shouldnt be fired.
Reply
2-15-2011 @ 3:34PM
John said...Jeezzzzzzzz Is this not a free country, What happned to freedom of speech? Need I say more!! I am a vet did I fight for these rights. Go pick on the real bad ones DUH
Reply
2-15-2011 @ 3:35PM
Drew said...This is my high school, and i was very offended when i heard about this
Reply
2-15-2011 @ 5:09PM
Susie said...Get over it. If there is someone in your school that her blogs describe, there is nothing you or anyone else can do about it. (It is probably you she is describing or one of your buddies or your honey anyway.)
2-15-2011 @ 5:10PM
tony said...You should be offended by the fact that your fellow students dress and act the way that they do, not someone calling out the fact that your generation is (in many cases) completely lacking when it comes to morality and conscience. This, of course, translates to pathetic parenting and none of the individuals who are doing this poor job of parenting want to be called out. It all comes back to personal responsibility. No one wants to accept the fact that they have children that act like they were raised by wolves, and those kids who act that way are not used to being called out on their behavior because it is easier for their parents to ignore it than it is to actually be a parent.