Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Charlotte Robinson: LISTEN: How Gay And Lesbian Couples Become…
New Turnaround Teacher 'Trying To Get It Right' In Tough School
SmackDown: Should Women Have Home Births?
Filed under: Opinions, Delivery

Illustration by Dori Hartley
Home Birth? Here's Why You're Wrong to Choose One
by Tom Henderson
First of all, ladies, let it be known I have no dog in this fight. As a male, I will never personally experience (thank you, Lord) the miracle that is childbirth.
Plus, returning to the dog metaphor, my previous owner had me neutered.
Thus, my familiarity with the birthing process begins and ends with the remake of "The Exorcist" my ex-wife performed when she was in labor with our son. I will never go through that again, so far be it from me to tell you how to bring forth new life.
Instead, I will merely ask a a couple of simple questions. First, do you want to give birth at home? And if so, are you feather-plucking insane?!
I know women have many reasons for opting for home births. I used to serve on the board of a clinic that included midwifery services. The at-home midwives and doulas were great people for whom I have tremendous respect. I just don't understand why anyone would use their services -- at least at home.
So I did some research. Here are some of the reasons to choose a home birth. Let's examine a few of them, shall we?
1. Your home is cleaner than a hospital.
This is supposedly because hospitals are full of yucky germs and sick people. Your house is clean and sparkly. Riiight -- if you're an obsessive-compulsive neat freak who sterilizes her kitchen utensils in an autoclave.
Hospitals are a lot cleaner than your house. Trust me. This is why the authorities get a little testy if you perform brain surgery in your kitchen.
2. Your chances of getting a C-section are reduced with a home birth.
Your doctor isn't going to perform a C-section because she really wants to try out her new Swiss Army Knife. If she says you need a C-section, trust her. The situation is serious. This is not the time for a wait-and-see attitude. You need to be cut open, and the best place to be cut open is a hospital.
Want to get the latest ParentDish news and advice? Sign up for our newsletter!
Why I Chose to Stay at Home and Have My Baby
by Denise Cortes of BabyCenter
When I was about to give birth to my first child, I remember my OB walking into the delivery room, crossing her arms over her chest magnanimously and announcing, "OK. I'm here. Now you can have this baby!" Then she stretched out her arms so the nurse could slip on her gown and tie the mask to her face like she was James freaking Brown or something. All she needed was a nurse to dab her sweat.
Meanwhile, I was laying there spread-eagled, my feet up in the stirrups with a baby practically dangling from my lady parts. Not the most dignified of positions.
I told myself I would never allow that to happen again. But it did, 15 months later. This time, the nurse peeked under the sheet to see what all the fuss was about after she heard me panting like a wild boar.
"Oh!"
"I have to push, now!"
"Honey, you have to wait until the doctor gets here. Don't make me deliver this baby!"
So we spent the next 15 minutes or so with me doing my wild boar impersonation and the nurse holding my baby's head between my legs until the doctor walked in and my baby shot out like a rocket.
That is when I started researching home birth.
I didn't have movies like "The Business of Being Born" to help me form my opinion, or to educate me with statistics about how safe home birth was, and how harmful unnecessary medical intervention was. It was little old me, the library, various search engines, Barbara Harper's "Gentle Birth Choices," my raggedy copies of "The Compleat Mother," my heartfelt convictions and my dreams of a natural childbirth (preferably in the water). Where were you Ricki Lake, back in 2000? People just didn't have home births. And if you did, you were on the fringes of society. People thought I was crazy.
But I wasn't crazy. I was finally making sense.
Click here to read the rest of the SmackDown on BabyCenter.
Related: Silent childbirth? Holy crap!
Related: When women fear childbirth












ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
3-09-2011 @ 12:20PM
Leanne said...Tom, if you think a labour room is a sterile field, you are nuts!
Midwives carry THE EXACT SAME BASIC BIRTH TOOLS as the hospital, all nicely sterile, wrapped in the exact same green cloth as the packages at the hospital. However, since home births focus on only using interventions when they are medically indicated and are designed to prevent iatrogenic problems, using those tools is pretty darned rare.
C-section rates are so high because the vast majority of birthing women are given medical interventions as standard (pitocen, IV fluids, ABX, epidurals, continuous EFM, AROM...) that, combined with non-medically induced inductions (baby not ready to come out), impatience with the normal pace of labour, inefficient birth positions and a systematic unfamiliarity with physiologically normal birth means that 1 in every 3 women get wheeled into operating theatres for surgical deliveries.
ERGO: remove the use of pitocin, the use of continuous EFM, the IV fluids, AROM, epidurals and add in more flexible labour timetables, encouragement of labour movement, flexibility of birth position and you suddenly have safer, healthier births for moms and babies and less surgery.
No brainer. Healthy pregnancies have better outcomes when examining all factors - mortality AND morbidity - and when attended by a trained and licensed midwife of MD.
When you let surgeons oversee the birth processes of all birthing women, you will end up with more surgeries.
Reply
3-09-2011 @ 1:06PM
Alicia said...How about it is no one's damn business where a woman decides to give birth? dear god, between this and breastfeeding, it's amazing maternity wards, PTA meetings and Mommy & Me classes aren't battlefields, complete with mustard gas and bloodshed.
How about women make the best choices for them when it comes to parenting and everyone else butts the hell out?
Reply
3-09-2011 @ 3:46PM
Lauren said...Wow, I thought both articles were lamely written. Both seemed so terribly flawed. The guy was too sarcastic and the woman, a bit dramatic. A nurse who doesn't know how to deliver? Didn't happen at my hospital. The nurse made it very clear that she could do the job if the doctor didn't arrive on time.
Here's one thing to consider as well. What about the baby being too big for you to deliver? That can sometimes be difficult to know until its too late. That was the case with my first one. After the doctor intervened, he said that no amount of pushing would have ever gotten him out. Try getting through that at home. Also why pass up the glorious painkillers? Its easier to "enjoy the moment" when you're not suffocated by the pain. Just my thoughts, enjoy the home birth experience if that's what you want. Me? I want to be drugged ;)
Reply
3-09-2011 @ 5:07PM
Amy Tuteur, MD said...ALL the existing scientific evidence, as well as US national statistics and state statistics such as those from Colorado show that PLANNED homebirth with a homebirth midwife TRIPLES the rate of neonatal death.
Homebirth midwives (CPMs) are nothing like certified nurse midwives or the midwives in other first world countries. In fact, homebirth midwives have less education and less training than ANY midwives in the first world. ALL other midwives have university degrees and many have master's degrees. The CPM is nothing more than a post high school certificate. American homebirth midwives (CPMs) do not have enough education to be licensed in The Netherlands, the UK, Canada, Australia or any other industrialized nation.
For a glimpse of the harm they cause, read Wren's story on Hurt by Homebirth. Today is the first anniversary of his homebirth and death.
Reply
3-10-2011 @ 12:15PM
Tina Warren, DC said...Dr. Amy,
Would you kindly post references to ALL the scientific evidence that shows that homebirths lead to higher mortality? Because the vast majority of my reading and the opinion of my GYN, who runs a birth center and shares space with a homebirth midwife, shows the opposite.
Just on a VERY brief search, I found this
"Coincidentally, the same day, I receive in my inbox a notification of a newly released study out of Ontario, Canada published in the most recent issue of Birth journal. The study examines the outcomes associated with planned home-birth compared to planned hospital birth, facilitated by midwives, in Ontario over a three-year period (from 2003-2006). The authors find that, in fact, there is no difference between planned home and hospital birth when comparing perinatal and neonatal mortality rates (or maternal mortality rates, either). " (oops, guess not ALL the science vilifies homebirth....gotta watch those absolutes!)
this was from rhrealitycheck blog. i can't post the link here, but i bet you can find it.
I chose homebirth for my first and only child for many of the same reasons as Denise (minus, of course, negative prior hospital birth experiences)...I wanted it to be peaceful and quiet and involve people I chose and trusted to attend me and follow my wishes to the fullest extent possible. I did not fear childbirth and I trusted my body to do what it was made to do. And it did, remarkably.
That said, if you are truly more comfortable with the readily available interventions of the hospital setting and you are making your choice with the best interests of yourself and your baby truly in mind, I say God Bless and I wish you the best. After all, the end goal is a healthy baby. I just hope there's no MRSA or flu-carriers among the many caregivers by whom your baby will be handled....
3-12-2011 @ 6:31PM
Amy Tuteur, MD said...Tina,
Homebirth midwives in the US (Certified Professional Midwives or CPMs) do not meet either the educational or the clinical standards of Canadian midwives; indeed CPMs do not meet the licensing standards for ANY first world countries.
All Canadian midwives are university educated and hospital trained and work both at home and in the hospital. In addition, Canadian midwives are heavily regulated and homebirth is only available to women who meet the government criteria for homebirth. And Canadian midwives are completely integrated into the hospital system with guaranteed available physician back up.
In contrast American CPMs don't have a college degree; the CPM is merely a post high school certificate. They have no hospital based training; they aren't qualified to practice in hospitals. They are completely unregulated, violate their own professional standards all the time (by delivering breech, postdates and twins at home), usually don't have physician back up and generally dump their patients in the local emergency room when a problem develops.
The ONLY existing study that compared American CPMs to comparable risk hospital birth (Johnson and Daviss, BMJ 2005) claimed to show that homebirth with a CPM in 2000 was as safe as hospital birth. However, Johnson and Daviss pulled a bait and switch. They compared homebirth in 2000 to a bunch of out of date studies extending back to 1969! When you compared homebirth with a CPM in 2000 to low risk hospital birth in 2000, you find that homebirth with a CPM has nearly TRIPLE the mortality rate for low risk hospital birth.
The US government has been collecting statistics on PLANNED homebirth since 2003. Those statistics also show that planned homebirth has triple the neonatal mortality rate of low risk hospital birth.
3-09-2011 @ 5:32PM
Lisa said...Home births are dangerous! I don't care about anyone's birth plan! You never ever ever know what can go wrong (as I learned first hand) and it is best to be in the hospital when it does!
Reply
3-09-2011 @ 6:22PM
Emily said...I think it is a very individual choice, and depends on the circumstances. I don't think a homebirth is inherently dangerous and wrong, and I also don't think a hospital birth is unnatural etc. I had my first, and thus far only, child at a hospital, and it was a very enjoyable (as far as labor goes haha) experience. I wanted to attempt it without drugs, and I did. I was allowed to stroll around the halls with my husband and mom accompanying me, stopping to rub my back when contractions came, and just made it back to the room every half hour or so in order to monitor progress. I could use the birthing ball, or lay on the bed, whatever I wanted and I did all of these at different points. Overall, I wouldn't trade it at all!
Purely anecdotal evidence, but it seems to me that most of the epidurals, inductions, and c-sections came from that mother's choice. And that's not my place to decide. If you don't agree with your doctor's views (ie s/he wants to induce, etc.) then shop around for a doctor or midwife more compatible with your ideas. There are a great variety of medical professionals out there, and just like most everything else, there isn't a one-size-fits-all here!
Reply
3-20-2011 @ 11:13AM
April said...Amy, please tell me where you found those statistics. I have not found any studies that say that planned homebirth = tripled neonatal deaths.
Reply
3-09-2011 @ 9:41PM
Mom said...this is what drives me nuts on this subject, when something goes terribly wrong and the baby and the mothers' life is possibly at RISK then we rush to the hospital, why not give your child the best benefit and a good beginning and go to a certified birthing center or the best local hospital. Being a Mom means putting your baby ahead of yourself. Yeah! for those of you who had a home delivery without complications. Consider yourself blessed as it's not always the case.
Reply
3-09-2011 @ 10:01PM
Candace said...Why on earth did you choose this guy for a debate on this topic? It just makes a mockery of the whole issue. While I have not chosen a homebirth, I do believe it is a viable option for a lot of women. There are also some reasonable concerns about homebirthing.
But this?
This is just a not-ready-for-primetime stand-up routine.
There is no fact, no information, no argument.
And the c-section bit is downright ignorant. Tell me, why is the c-section rate in the United States triple what is considered ideal? Why is our maternal death rate so outrageously high compared to other developed nations?
About 5% of births really necessitate a c-section. To be conservative, a rate of about 11-15% saves more lives than it takes. So, why on earth do we have a c-section rate of over 32%? Is that really necessary?
And this outrageous rate has real deadly implications for both women and for babies.
Reply
3-10-2011 @ 7:10AM
Sally said...I recently had a relative, in her 20s, with a completely normal pregnancy, have a serious problem with the baby at birth and the baby had to be airlifted from her regular hospital to a children's hospital in the nearest major city. She was in a hospital, and her baby nearly died--had she been at home, what are the chances she would have been able to get the emergency services her baby needed in time to save her life? Sorry, I know women have been having babies forever, but when you have expert options in medical care, do you really want to take the risk with your child? Sorry, the inconvenience and "embarrassment" of having medical providers looking up your skirt is a small price to pay for safety. If the one baby in a thousand that needs help (and sometimes it's the mother who is gravely ill!) is yours, the statistics don't really matter. When I had my kids more than 25 years ago, I had healthy babies and healthy pregnancies but problems in labor and delivery--thankfully I had trained people to save my children!
Reply
3-10-2011 @ 11:04AM
michelle said...Actually, studies around the globe (including the US) have shown that home-birth with a qualified home-birth attendent (be it Dr. or Midwife) for a normal low-risk pregnancy have better outcomes overall for both mother and baby. These studies have also shown that hospital interventions that escalate to c-sections and repeat c-sections are more harmful to the mothers to the points of permanent damage and possible death. C-sections deaths related are highly under reported because they cause infections that are not usually found until after a mother goes home from the hospital and returns. These are rarely noted as birth related deaths even though they are.
This is an extremely loaded topic and deeply personal. I have had horrible hospital birth experiences, where the Dr. acted like I was an idiot and was too stupid to make any decisions for myself. These types of people need to be removed from birth altogether, there is no place for a self-righteous Dr. playing God. I have dealt with the escalation of interventions and know how easily my birth(s) could have turned into unnecessary c-sections. I would recommend the book Pushed, Jennifer Block. She does a very good job of showing both sides of this issue and talks with Doctors, midwives, and nurses. She cites all her sources (studies, research) and gives what I believe to be a very clear assessment.
Reply
3-10-2011 @ 11:30AM
Bridget said...For one, I really don't think a man is the best option to argue these points. Yes, fathers can be/and are active participants of the birthing experience, but ultimately it is the woman who has the most invested in the process. It's not only about the baby.
To each their own. It's none of my business or should it be the business of anyone else where/when/ and how a woman decides to give birth to her child.
Reply
3-10-2011 @ 7:38PM
ginafer said...I get sick and tired of how the hospital OB SAVED all of these women's and babies lives. If they didn't have all of these stupid medical interventions, drugs and procedures to alter labor then maybe they wouldn't need to be SAVED! Don't go putting one sad story about a homebirth gone wrong! How rude! Did you read about the baby in Canada last year who died because of the hospitals procedures used during his birth? Would I use that against you if you chose a hospital birth...I hope not what a jerk I would be! And I have used a CNM for a homebirth, and frankly I would never ever do that again. For all of her medical training she has sadly lost sight of her female intuition.
And this mans commentary being put up against a homebirth article must have been for fun. Because we all know the illusion of hospital sterility is a breading ground for disease. You're giving birth and two floors up a man is hacking up phlegm as he fights MRSA! That sounds fun! I am so glad my hospital is right down the road so if I have an emergency, and I have, then I can go there. But I would never go there in-case of emergency! Absurd! This arguement is so old to me. I am planning my 5th homebirth. I just can't stand when disillusioned people give credit to their OB for saving their life without acknowledging that that same OB is also responsible for causing the life threatening emergency!
Reply
3-24-2011 @ 10:14PM
hjdir said...you konw it,just not miss it
Reply