Peanut Allergy Protest a 'Misunderstanding,' Florida School District Says
Filed under: Medical Conditions, In The News, Health
Officials for a Florida school district are saying that parents protesting efforts to protect one student from a peanut allergy is -- in a nutshell -- all a big misunderstanding.
A student at Edgewater Elementary School, part of the Volusia County School District in DeLand, Fla., has such a severe food allergy that her first-grade classmates are asked to wash their hands before entering their classrooms in the morning and again at lunch.
They also were required to rinse their mouths after lunch, but district spokeswoman Nancy Wait tells ParentDish that requirement was recently changed to simply wiping their faces with a wet cloth -- a change made even before parents decided to protest the district's efforts to keep the unnamed female student safe.
"The same procedures were in place last year, and they have been in place all of this year," Wait says. "This is really a misunderstanding by some parents."
Some parents are saying the hand-washing is taking away from the children's instructional time, FoxNews.com reports, and some picketed the school last week, carrying signs that read, "Our Kids Have Rights Too."
"On average, it's probably taking a good 30 minutes out of the day. That's my child's education. Thirty minutes could be a whole subject," Carrie Starkey tells FoxNews.com. "We understand that they need to protect this girl, but these measures are just extreme. Procedures need to be set in place, but not procedures that will take away from our children's education."
But Wait says that simply isn't the case, adding that while she understands parents' concerns over the loss of instructional time, in general "washing hands is a good thing."
"It does take a little bit of time and there is a legitimate concern about cutting down instructional time," she tells ParentDish.
The teachers in the two classrooms affected have the process down to a science, Wait adds. Girls and boys line up at separate sinks and wash their hands and faces as efficiently as possible.
Parents also believed that peanut butter was banned from the school and that outside food was no longer welcome at holiday parties, all in service of one child's needs.
"Some people seem to believe that there aren't any peanut butter and jelly sandwiches being served in the cafeteria, but that isn't true," Wait says.
As for the parties, Wait tells ParentDish that it was a decision made by the teachers to focus the holiday celebrations around crafts instead of food, for general health and wellness reasons.
She adds that there was additional confusion over the fact that the first-graders are no longer being served a morning snack -- and that some parents even believed that teachers were washing their children's hands and faces with Clorox wipes.
Instead, Wait says, desks are wiped down with the cleaning cloths and snack time was nixed for scheduling reasons.
"There is no snack this year at the first-grade level, and some parents thought that was because of the peanut allergy," she tells ParentDish. "But it's because of where their lunch time falls. There's just no time to eat a snack beforehand."
Wait says district officials are taking one-on-one meetings with the upset parents to explain the rationale behind the preventative measures, and that there are four children at Edgewater Elementary who are sensitive to peanuts.
The little girl who sparked the controversy is the only student whose allergy is life-threatening -- and, under the Americans With Disabilities Act, the district is legally obliged to accommodate her medical needs.
Each student who falls under the purview of the ADA has a medical plan, developed in conjunction with his or her physicians, on file with the school. Wait says the school is required to comply with that plan.
This particular pupil's medical plan also called for a peanut-sniffing dog to search the school, looking for traces of the nut. Wait says that did, indeed, take place last week, while the students were on spring break.
The bottom line, Wait tells ParentDish, is that the district does whatever it can to balance the needs of one against the needs of many.
"We have moved so far beyond isolating children with disabilities," she says. "We are required to provide her with an education and to make accommodations for her disability."
David Bailey, the father of the unnamed student, could not be reached for comment. He did, however, tell FoxNews.com that he kept his daughter home on the day of the protests.
"They are against her," Bailey tells FoxNews.com. "This is all against her."
Want to get the latest ParentDish news and advice? Sign up for our newsletter!











ReaderComments (Page 3 of 19)
3-23-2011 @ 3:37PM
mike said...im with you, all that fuss, all that worry , take the rights away from all for one? bull, if little suzy or johnnie is that much at risk, then let him stay home, i would never and i did not expect special arrangments to be made for my son with learning disabilities, if he was disruptive he was taken out of the class, if he became a major problem he was picked up and removed from the class so other kids could learn in peace, of course this was back in the 80s , before parents expected everyone else to kiss their asses because their kid had a problem,,, sad country we are becoming
3-23-2011 @ 4:11PM
Babygirl said...Tell me, would you feel as you do if it were your child? I think not. It is so easy to criticize others when you don't have the same problem(s) or issue(s).
3-23-2011 @ 5:03PM
bunsbestgirl said...@lynn - if you had read the article, you would see that it was A PARENT that said "it's probably taking a good 30 minutes out of the day", not the writer. But you cannot tell me that each child loses 30 minutes each day washing their hands. Please! I wash my hands constantly at work and I can assure I do not lose 30 minutes per day doing it. These parents are jokes. They're certainly not teaching their kids humanity or compassion.
3-23-2011 @ 5:33PM
KC said...Oh, PLEASE! Peanut-sniffing dog, hand washing, mouth rinsing? This is more than just being accommodating, and accusing others for being insensitive or "anti-cleanliness" because they believe it's way over the top is asinine. If it were just an allergy to peanuts (i.e., "don't let her eat them"), that's a reasonable accommodation, but this girl's allergy is so severe that all students are required to wash before entering the classroom and the school must hire a peanut-sniffing dog to track down any trace of peanuts. That's a bit extreme. But I think everyone is missing the point...the school doesn't want to be sued and who can blame them? That may be the reason for the extreme measures, not the extend of the allergy. God forbid, if that child has one incident, or accident, with a peanut, guess who will be going to court? You got it.
3-23-2011 @ 2:12PM
Don said...This is pure hogwash - all this done because of one child's allergies. While we all wish to protect every child, forcing hundreds and hundreds of them to do this much is ridiculous. With no disrespect meant to anyone with a disability (I have them myself), it would be more proper to ensure that you have the child work around everyone else, not the opposite. This country has gone way overboard on a majority of subjects such as this and has become a country of mismanaged time, wasted time and effort all in the hope that one situation has to be totally rearranged around one person - the government spending your dollars and your children's time at your expense once again. There comes a time when we all have to say, too much is too much, how many others are going to be bothered or put out because of one person. Were we to place everyone that has some type of ailment or needs some type of accomodation above that of the majority, we'd get nothing done in this country. It seems we're doing a pretty good job of doing just that right now.
Reply
3-23-2011 @ 2:13PM
Mek said...again society has gone so far to the extreme that one person's rights are more important than a majority...make the child wear a mask and latex gloves for her safety instead of making 3o children change thier lives and routines...can it be so hard? and so crazy to understand?...unbelievable!!!!
Reply
3-23-2011 @ 3:54PM
Anon said...Go wash your hands and face.
3-23-2011 @ 4:34PM
Babygirl said...Being "asked" to wash your hands and to, maybe for go snack time. Why should a child have to be asked to wash his/her hands? This is something that should come naturally, if this is what you are taught to do. As far as the snack(s), if they stay away from the snack table it wouldn't be so difficult for them to waddle to the sink to wash their hands. I truly hope none of you naysayer EVER have a child(ren) with ANY type of disability. From some of the comments on here you would probably lock them in a closet so you wouldn't have to wash your hands and keep all the snacks for yourself.
3-23-2011 @ 2:12PM
Abby said...Shame on the parents who protested. Every child has a right to a public education. Besides, the children washing their faces and hands is good hygene, and will not only help the child with alergies but will help cut down on the spreading of colds and flu's. Besides if the protesting parents were honest with themselves, they would admit that if it was their child with the alergies, they would want this.
Reply
3-23-2011 @ 2:18PM
toemouse said...I have a peanut allergy that is this severe. If I talk to a saleperson who may have had a peanut candy bar for a snack or if I go to a grocery store that has made peanut butter cookies earlier that day, I could die within minutes. It's bad enough to feel like each minute I live out in public (the bank, the store, a business office) could be my last, I also have careless people working against people like me. The kids at the mall or a park leaving smears of peanut butter on railings, door handles or merchandise. Moms and dads, please wipe their hands!
I feel for this girl. I am 45 years old and am surprised every night that I have made it through another day. I realize the school is going through extremes, but I would like to feel like people would not mind an inconvenience to save another person's life. I would definitely do anything possible for someone else!
Reply
3-23-2011 @ 2:45PM
Chris S. said...Quit playing the victim. Carry your epinephrine with you. There's also a possibility you could run over by a bus everyday, but since you behave responsibly that possibility is next to zero. Allergies are the same. The school is grossly overreacting in an attempt to reduce their liability and not doing this little girl any favors by sheltering her from reality.
PS. What world do you live in that there is peanut butter smeared on nearly every surface? Maybe your allergist can recommend a good therapist.
3-23-2011 @ 2:50PM
Walter said...I am very sorry that you have this allergy BUT I did not cause you to have the allergy. It is not my fault that you are this way and I should not be punished because of it.
3-23-2011 @ 3:09PM
Koz said...Get a latex body suit with rfilter for your mouth.
3-23-2011 @ 3:23PM
wow said...Wow I can't believe how selfish people are. You don't need to harass others for having allergies. My brother has a peanut allergy and although it isn't so severe that he can't be in a room with peanuts, he could still die if he touched or ate anything with peanuts. And just so you know, more than 12 million Americans have food allergies so it's not like it is some rare disease that no one should have to adapt to. People can't help having an allergy and the insensitivity shown by Chris S. just astounds me. These are children's lives at stake here and he acts like its some psychological problem that people play as a victim card. I really don't think it's that hard to wash your hands- I'm not sure about anyone else but in my grade school, especially in the younger grades, we always stopped to wash our hands at the restrooms before and after lunch if only to stop the spread of germs. And to say the school is "sheltering her from reality"? Try they are keeping her alive! I'm not sure if you know any first-graders, but they typically aren't as aware of their surroundings as adults. You wouldn't let children just run in the streets in traffic just because it's sheltering them since they will cross the street as adults in ten years!
3-23-2011 @ 3:43PM
mike said...sounds like maybe you would be better off /well you know. if life is so horrible solve the problem,,
3-23-2011 @ 4:27PM
Chris S. said...Thank you for calling me out by name wow. You may not have been able to glean it from my comment, but just so you know, I have the same anaphylactic response to certain foods that toemouse and your brother do. Toemouse is indeed playing the victim in her comment. "Each minute out in public" has zero chance of "being her last" if she's responsible and carrying her adrenaline. Seeing as how you've never been to an allergist, I understand that you fail to comprehend that the patient bears most of the responsibility for recognizing and treating their own symptoms, and that a mass sterilization of an entire elementary school is highly irregular and unnecessary. To do so is indeed "sheltering her from reality" because hey, guess what, the entire world has not been sterilized of peanuts. Your own metaphor is a little unwieldy for this situation as well because the situations are not equal, a fairer comparison in your metaphor would be that nobody is allowed to drive on the street because a child may want to play in traffic. Sorry bud, but being melodramatic about possibilities and throwing around the disabled label isn't helping anybody. Nor is it "saving" lives.
3-23-2011 @ 2:15PM
OMG, really said...These kids are not being punished. They are being asked to wash their hands so a child doesn't die.
Reply
3-23-2011 @ 2:16PM
alfavil said...Gimme a break. I am sorry to say the young girl is the one with the problem, not her classmates. A telling detail is that the father talked to Focks. Kids have to eat dirt and roll around with the hens in the backyard. American kids are over protected and spoiled sick as it is. They may be able to avoid parasites and microbes but they will deveop allergies. And no protection form the Republican psychos who run the system.
Reply
3-23-2011 @ 2:41PM
hokees said...Oh, get a heart, people! These kids (and there aren't "hundreds" of them at this school---there are two classes) aren't being "punished". They are learning a very important lesson---that if you can do one small thing (such as washing your hands and mouth---whoa, what a punishment!) to help another human being stay healthy and alive, then you're a better person for it. These kids have the opportunity to learn this and grow up to be better adults---unfortunately, their idiotic parents are quickly undoing that lesson and instead teaching their kids to be self centered, unsympathetic and intolerant. I wonder how they would feel if their child could literally die in minutes because some selfish parent thought their "rights" were being infringed? Shame on all of you protestors...may you never have to face what this little girl and her parents face every day. As for the school---they are legally obligated to comply with the law.
4-12-2011 @ 7:49PM
Stacey said...Just curious how you would explain infants having a reaction to their mothers breastmilk b/c she ate peanut butter. Perhaps the baby didn't "roll around in dirt" enough. I'm just not buying that peanut allergies come about b/c we are too clean. Explain why I have four children and only one allergic to peanuts, since infanthood?