Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Lisa Belkin: The Tornado In Oklahoma Is This Parent's Living Nightmare
Jenn Horton: Every Mom Deserves Your Nod

The 7 Biggest Mistakes Newbie Baby Namers Make
Filed under: Baby Names
There are few things more thrilling in life than having your first baby. But newbie baby namers are prone to making some mistakes that more experienced name choosers are able to avoid.
If you're choosing a baby name for the first time, don't make one of these seven common mistakes:
1. Believing that the names that were popular -- and creative -- when you were a kid still have the same status.
Name tastes have changed radically over the last decade or two. Goodbye, Jessica and Josh, hello Layla and Serenity, Landon and Tristan -- all top 100 names.
2. Thinking that the playground rules are the same as they were back in the day.
Kids no longer get teased for having names that are unique, androgynous, exotic or hard to pronounce or spell. Rather, name diversity is celebrated.
3. Letting your parents have too much say in the baby's name.
Baby names can undoubtedly be a fun topic of family conversation. But the person who changes the diapers at 3 a.m. gets to name the baby.
4. Clinging too tightly to the name you always swore you'd give your first child.
A lot of people -- let's face it: girls -- spend their childhoods coming up with fanciful names they want to give their children. But if that name you always loved has suddenly become uber-popular or clashes with your new last name, let it go.
5. Caring too much about how cool the name choice makes you look.
Sure, pregnancy is cooler than it used to be, with cuter clothes and celebrity role models. But putting a name's cool factor above all else won't make little Bronx's life very easy.
6. Not considering subsequent children's names.
First-time namers are likely to think about, well, their first child's name, but if you name Baby No. 1 Tallulah, then you pretty much rule out Lula, Lila, Delilah, Sula, Tally and maybe even Louis for subsequent children.
7. Not realizing that there's going to be a real live baby ... and child ... and, eventually, grownup on the other end of the naming decision.
We get it that it can seem like your pregnancy is all about you. Sometimes, it can almost come as a shock when an actual baby emerges in the delivery room, instantly asserting her own needs and personality. Try to keep that little (and eventually big) person in mind when you choose the name she'll live with forever.
Want to get the latest ParentDish news and advice? Sign up for our newsletter!
The Name Babes are Pamela Redmond Satran and Linda Rosenkrantz, founders of Nameberry.com, innovators of baby-name content on the Web. Got a name craving? Learn more about baby names at Nameberry.com.
If you're choosing a baby name for the first time, don't make one of these seven common mistakes:
1. Believing that the names that were popular -- and creative -- when you were a kid still have the same status.
Name tastes have changed radically over the last decade or two. Goodbye, Jessica and Josh, hello Layla and Serenity, Landon and Tristan -- all top 100 names.
2. Thinking that the playground rules are the same as they were back in the day.
Kids no longer get teased for having names that are unique, androgynous, exotic or hard to pronounce or spell. Rather, name diversity is celebrated.
3. Letting your parents have too much say in the baby's name.
Baby names can undoubtedly be a fun topic of family conversation. But the person who changes the diapers at 3 a.m. gets to name the baby.
4. Clinging too tightly to the name you always swore you'd give your first child.
A lot of people -- let's face it: girls -- spend their childhoods coming up with fanciful names they want to give their children. But if that name you always loved has suddenly become uber-popular or clashes with your new last name, let it go.
5. Caring too much about how cool the name choice makes you look.
Sure, pregnancy is cooler than it used to be, with cuter clothes and celebrity role models. But putting a name's cool factor above all else won't make little Bronx's life very easy.
6. Not considering subsequent children's names.
First-time namers are likely to think about, well, their first child's name, but if you name Baby No. 1 Tallulah, then you pretty much rule out Lula, Lila, Delilah, Sula, Tally and maybe even Louis for subsequent children.
7. Not realizing that there's going to be a real live baby ... and child ... and, eventually, grownup on the other end of the naming decision.
We get it that it can seem like your pregnancy is all about you. Sometimes, it can almost come as a shock when an actual baby emerges in the delivery room, instantly asserting her own needs and personality. Try to keep that little (and eventually big) person in mind when you choose the name she'll live with forever.
Want to get the latest ParentDish news and advice? Sign up for our newsletter!
The Name Babes are Pamela Redmond Satran and Linda Rosenkrantz, founders of Nameberry.com, innovators of baby-name content on the Web. Got a name craving? Learn more about baby names at Nameberry.com.











ReaderComments (Page 4 of 14)
4-10-2011 @ 8:34PM
Erica said...Completely disagree with #1. I don't think it is a "mistake" to give your child a name you love, if it just so happens to not be uber trendy right now. #1 also contradicts #5 about parents trying too hard to be cool. Don't think that parents who did #1 are fooled into thinking their names are still as popular, perhaps they are trying to be individuals and not follow the herd!
Reply
4-10-2011 @ 8:39PM
Jean said...Do not name your baby after your best friend, because if your best freind winds up becoming your worst enemy..................
Reply
4-10-2011 @ 8:36PM
Alexandra said...Tallulah? Are you kidding? I have a great-niece named "Isis", and a great-nephew named "Zion"! Traditionalist me is VERY, VERY concerned about these unconventional names. Diversity may be celebrated in the play-ground...but what about when they apply for jobs? A front-office receptrionistr named "Isis" won't be very popular at a 5-star hotel, (unless it's located in Egypt, of course. But we live in the USA!) I even get upset about my OTHER great-nieces' names: "Rosie" and "Sadie". They are SO "Non-U", (non-upper class, as in the book "U and Non-U" by Nancy Mitford.) I can bet that Prince William and Princess Catherine will NOT name their son "Zion" -- or their daughters "Rosie", "Sadie" or "Isis"! I myself have a Biblical name, and it has always caused me no end of embarrassment. ("Alexandra" is a pseudonym). I believe in the American Dream and in EQUALITY. If upper-class people can name their children with normal, elegant names, ("Edward", "Elizabeth", "William", "Catherine", "Phillip", "Margaret"), WHY can't we "common" people have these "normal" names, too?
(Princess Margaret was born "Margaret Rose"...but SHE didn't like the name "Rose", and abandoned it.) I also have two OTHER great-nephews with the names "Atticus" and "Asher". With all these weird names around, (and others, of people UNrelated to me, like "Taheesha", and God-knows-what-else), my own Biblical name is beginning to seem (almost) normal! Wake up, people! Even a guy with the name "Peregrine" will always get ahead of one named "Avrumchick" or "Tonyata". WASPs (White Anglo Saxon Protestrants), still rule, albeit less absolutely than before. Giving your child an Ethnic or "Diversity" name, ("Rainbow"), is putting them at a distinct disadvantage, 20 years hence, when and if they want an "up market" career. If you have enough money, (as movie stars' kids do), for them not to have to worry about getting a good job later on, then name them "Waterfall" or "Babushka", if you wish.
But having a normal name is a big help-- don't deny your kids this!
Nothing wrong in living there -- but it IS a bit embarrassing, when applying for a job, to say you come from "Truth Or Consequences, New Mexico." The same goes for "weird" names!
Reply
4-10-2011 @ 8:58PM
Amanda said...WTF are you going on about. I think Isis is a rather pretty name. Get over yourself.
4-10-2011 @ 9:05PM
renee said...And what makes a "normal" name. What is it to you what your family members named their children. Let them live their life, and you should live yours too, instead of bashing your family all over the internet. It's not a good look and it's cheap.
4-10-2011 @ 9:14PM
emajin25 said...Wow. You're just all over the place. Calm down, Alexandra. Names are very important selections by parents. I agree that a name has significant impact on the perceptions of others. Tell me this. Do those perceptions materialize just because one perceives them? It doesn't change the person for who they are. Instead, it strikes curiosity and celebrates diversity. Your posting makes once perceive that you haven't been 15 miles out from where you live, hun. Accept your name, grow up, and move on. Change it if ya like. But, you cannot go condemning others for which names they choose for their children. By the way, Alexander the Great was gay, or at least bi-sexual.......how shall I perceive you, hun?
4-10-2011 @ 9:16PM
danglingm said...Amanda....I think what she is saying is that Destiny will probably never be president. With that being said....I don't agree with the above statement BUT that doesn't make it not true. Sadly.
4-10-2011 @ 9:18PM
Alexandra said...Dear Amanda:
I thank you for your, (ahem), "delicacy" of using 'WTF" as
initials, instead of spelling out the entire off-colour phrase! Yes, "Isis" IS a rather pretty name -- but it is NOT a name one finds on the debutante lists at the top debutante balls....OR in the best sororities, zip codes, executive offices, etc. Forgive me, please -- I want only the BEST for my great nephews and nieces. A "normal" name isn't everything -- but it sure can help! I'm sure I'm not the only person who is extremely annoyed when, asking for technical computer assistance, or ANY assistance on the phone, I get a very nice-sounding person, yet with the name of "Tondelayercake", or similar outlandish name! WHAT is wrong with normal names people seem always either to have had, or to have changed their name to? "Victoria", "Madeleine", "Paul", "Peter", "Jean", "Grace", "Antoinette", "Frederick", "Mary", "George"....if these names are good enough for royalty, should they not be good enough for us?
4-10-2011 @ 9:34PM
Laura said...Studies have shown that, in general, people with ordinary names with ordinary spellings are more successful in the job world. (Think Bill Gates and Steve Jobs.) That may not be true in the future when no one has an ordinary name, but certainly something to consider when naming a baby.
4-10-2011 @ 9:30PM
Kelly said...Alexandra, I agree. Emajin must be the one who hasn't been very far. I have lived all over the country, and consider myself pretty open minded. But when going through job applications, I still make fun of the really stupid names some poor people have been given by their parents. Especially the very ghetto sounding names. These people may be absolutely the best candidate out there, but they are showing up to an interview at a decided disadvantage. It may be wrong, but it is the sad truth.
4-10-2011 @ 9:43PM
moe said...why in the world shoukd we care about what rich people and royalty name their very screwed up kids? you ever here of n.o.k.? they have. it means not our kind, and it's your and ny kids they're talking about, no matter wut his or her name is.
4-10-2011 @ 11:02PM
patti said...so what are YOUR kids names?? do you have kids? i didnt hear any mention of that...or i possibly missed it since your comment was so dreadfully long-winded. while i do understand the point you are attempting to make, i feel the need to remind you that there is a great possiblity that some of the names that you have singled out belong to peoples children, who are people themselves by the way, and it is extremely rude and insulting of you to be ranting on in such a negative way about said names. oh, and by the way...in case you havent noticed, the president of the United States happens to be named Barack.
4-10-2011 @ 11:32PM
isisreptiles said...My name is Isis. It's a wonderful name and a great conversation-starter. And people remember it. I have gotten nothing but positive feedback about my name. And no, I do not live in Egypt.
Now, I don't know what it would be like to have that name as a child, as I changed my name from the fad name du jour given me by my parents. Growing up having a name that everyone else had was far from fun. In every class there was always at least two with my name, and often more than that.
Unusual names are great as long as they aren't something stupid, like some of the celebrities' kids' names.
4-10-2011 @ 11:38PM
rymake said...And remember that the popularity of names changes from generation to generation. Sadie and Rosie, your grand-nieces' names, are quite common now, and don't have the connotations that they may have had 2 generations ago. And all the royalty you mention have names that seem quite old-fashioned to current child-bearing couples.
4-10-2011 @ 11:40PM
my4salebox said...Alexandra, I particularly enjoyed your post and it made a lot of good sense. And it also was quite humorous read.
And I agree with your philosophy of names. You're not saying we should CARE about royalty, you are saying "Look at how some people succeed and others don't."
Bang on correct!
And someone said that names don't change who a person is. That is flat out wrong. There have been studies that show when a person has a frumpy name, or a weak name, they tend to take it to heart. When they have a strong name, they do better and feel better about themselves.
No worries, Alexandra. AOL users just generally don't like reality on comment boards.
4-10-2011 @ 11:44PM
my4salebox said...By the way, in the early 80's my elementary school sister had a little friend named Starla. Obviously, a daughter of hippies. I've wondered here and there over the years how that woman is getting along with that name if she didn't go into the arts. "Was she relegated to no career or service industry jobs?"
Parents should be more selfless when naming.
4-10-2011 @ 11:59PM
mia said...hi isis.
my ancestors came over before those prudes on the mayflower (on both mom and dad's side), which makes me as waspy as they come, and i love your name. these people are living in the 40's and 50's. if you're not hired because of your name, you don't want to work there anyway, believe me.
4-11-2011 @ 12:57AM
jess said...Wow, someone has issues.
4-11-2011 @ 2:50AM
Jill Skylark said...Dear Alexandra:
I certainly see your point about a "weird" name presenting a disadvantage on a job application (although it certainly doesn't preclude that person getting that job)...
My question to you is this: What is essentially good about being "on the debutante lists at the top debutante balls"? What is essentially good about being like royalty?
4-11-2011 @ 2:47AM
Tara said...Alexandra, although your rather poorly collected rant was painfully snobbish, the point were you *trying* to make is a great truth. Note this opinion comes from a well-studied nineteen year old with a typical retail job.
My name is Tara, which, luckily, is a very on-the-fence name. It isn't too over-the-top nor is it too common. It also means very much to me, since my late grandmother gave me the name after the house in her favorite movie, Gone With The Wind. Honestly, I don't believe that any other name would fit me. However, when I book a high-end hotel and the reservation's agent has a name harboring every letter of th alphabet and THEN some... it's off-putting, despite how kind or intelligent they may be.
I don't necessarily believe that one should follow the trends of royal names, but still be "elegant". Your Atticus and Asher, for example - those names may have belonged to Victorian scholars or composers. They are elegant, intelligent-seeming, and depending on the last name, avoid being trashy or overused. As far as Rosie and Sadie? Those names DO sound a bit trashy. While "Atticus" may be your college professor or doctor's name, "Sadie" sounds like a stripper or...a dog. It is blunt and plain. Without the afformentioned elegance. Those names are "cute", yes, but name a cat Rosie, not a child.
A good rule of thumb, I think, is to imagine a desired name as a character in a book. If you were reading a book and, to take an name example from my current read, Leviticus Blue were a character. The name is aesthetically pleasing, unique, and the right amount of outlandish. The character is an esteemed historical figure in the setting. Would you believe that profession if his name were Raven Black? No, you would most likely laugh as you read it and not be able to take the character seriously. At the same time, if the character was named "John Anderson", it woul be *too* camoflauged. It has no ring to it and the initial interest of introduction would be lost.
I don't intend on having children, but I do dislike how kids are being named worse things than pets nowadays.