'Genderless' Baby Raises a Storm of Controversy
Filed under: In The News
When Kathy Witterick gave birth to her third child in January, friends and family knew not to send blue or pink balloons.
The Toronto Star reports that, following their home waterbirth, Witterick, 38, and her husband, David Stocker, 39, sent a simple email to everyone in their social network, explaining that they planned to keep their child's biological sex a secret. Only six people -- apart from Storm -- know the child's biological sex: the parents, his or her two brothers Jazz, 5, and Kio, 2, and the two midwives present at the baby's birth.
"We've decided not to share Storm's sex for now -- a tribute to freedom and choice in place of limitation, a stand up to what the world could become in Storm's lifetime (a more progressive place? ...)," the Toronto-based couple wrote.
At only 4 months old, Storm has already lived up to his or her name, birthing a tempest of controversy. The story has made international headlines, was featured on "Today" and "The View" this morning and has spurred ethical debates throughout the parenting blogosphere.
Baby Storm and older brother, Jazz. Credit: Steve Russell, Toronto Star
Cause for Concern?According to the Star, Witterick was inspired to hide Storm's biological sex from the public after reading Lois Gould's 1972 short story "X: A Fabulous Child's Story." The fictional account revolves around X, who hides his or her biological sex from the public. While neighbors are confused and at times angry about X's sexual ambiguity, X has a confident sense of self and embraces whatever gendered behavior -- be it dressing in pink and playing with Barbies or wearing blue and smashing Tonka trucks –- he or she sees fit. The story ends with the assertion, "by the time X's sex matters, it won't be a secret anymore!"
When the Star's report was published, outraged responses filled the newspaper's online comment section.
"This is a perfect example of why you should have a license to have children," Chrissy111 writes.
Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association, a Mississippi-based organization that promotes "traditional family values," tells Fox News he "[doesn't] think there's any question that this is going to do severe harm to this child. ... That child is either a male or female, and it's a tragedy that his parents or her parents are apparently unwilling to base their approach [to child rearing] on scientific and biological truth."
Other members of the psychiatric and psychological community, however, approach Witterick and Stocker's parenting ideology with more open minds.
"I would not presume harm on any individual child without knowing the full scope of development and the full understanding of the parents' decision," Dr. Scott Leibowitz, a psychiatrist at Children's Hospital Boston and liaison to the Gender Management Service, tells ParentDish. "Gender identity is typically formed around age 3, so the infant doesn't know one way or the other."
While Leibowitz mentioned studies that have implied children raised in unconventional ways do well by having positive egos, strength and resilience, he says "since no studies have been done [that involve] raising kids as a genderless role, [there's no way] to know what psychological effect this might have on the kid."
Family therapist Susan Stiffelman, who writes the AdviceMama column for ParentDish, says she applauds the family for trying to de-emphasize gender norms, but adds that she " just can't get behind an experiment with a human child."
She says her main concern does not lie with Storm, but rather with the child's older brothers being encouraged to keep their sibling's gender a secret. According to the Star, even Storm's grandparents do not know the baby's sex.
"It's typical for a 2-year-old child to say 'my little brother' or 'my little sister,' " she tells ParentDish. "This is not the same [kind of secret] as saying, 'don't tell anyone I beat you at night,' but there's the contradiction that they want to raise their children with a sense of freedom and a lack of restraint in terms of gender expectations and, at the very same time... they are confining their other children."
Is it Possible to Keep Biological Sex a Secret?
While this child-rearing experiment is unique, it is not unprecedented. In 2009, a Swedish newspaper created a similar uproar when it followed a family who raised its toddler, Pop, as gender neutral. There has been no follow up with the now 4-year-old child. In an email to the Star, Witterick indicates her family, will decline future interviews.
But many medical professionals question whether it is feasible to keep Storm's sex a secret for long.
"The truth is, I don't see remotely how that is possible," Stiffelman says. "As soon as that child goes pee-pee it's going to be over."
Marianne LaFrance, a professor of psychology and women's, gender and sexual studies at Yale University, wonders if the family, in spite of its best intentions, will be able to interact with Storm without gender biases.
"I would be surprised if they didn't behave differently despite their best efforts," LaFrance tells ParentDish. "Little things like that can combine over the course of days, months or years."
LaFrance cites studies that have found boy babies tend to be more "inconsolable" than girls, so they get a different type of nurturing that implies "big boys don't cry." Girls also tend to be held more, she adds. Other studies have shown that when people observe a crying baby and are told it is a girl, the child is labeled "sad." When told the baby is a boy, however, observers find the baby "angry."
Story Just Part of a Bigger Issue
Backlash to Witterick and Stocker's decision has brought about discussion surrounding the larger societal issue of accepting those who do not fit into gender norms.
Online comments critiqued not only Storm's ambiguous sex, but the fact that Kio loves purple and Jazz is allowed to wear his hair in braids tied with colorful elastics and sparkly dresses.
"We really need to ask ourselves why it is that we are so uncomfortable when children express themselves differently," says Cheryl Kilodavis, author of the children's book "My Princess Boy," a term coined by her pink tutu-loving son.
Kilodavis says she hopes this story will invigorate a national conversation about accepting all children, even if they defy gender stereotypes.
"It is very courageous to challenge [the world] on adjectives that you use on children," Kilodavis tells ParentDish. "Instead of saying what a strong boy what a pretty girl, they are saying what a strong or beautiful child."
Do you agree with Storm's parent's decision to raise their child genderless? Join the discussion on Facebook!
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- patent or not civil case the inventor will never lose because the people approved and he makes the rules. it did not exist
- Locating election information former governor foia or court order?
- While attempting to explain consider who your explaining to. building a government may seem like gilligan's island to a person that can't











ReaderComments (Page 2 of 66)
5-26-2011 @ 6:52PM
KJC said...Trying too be gender nuetral.....are you kidding...their other child, a son, in the picture has long braids like a girl would wear. How does that make sense? I feel sorry for these kids whose parents seem to feel that their children should be an experiment. Why do some people have such a hard time finding individuality within culture which seem to have worked pretty well for thousands of years and have had room for some pretty unique people without being bizarre? I think the parents are having an attention crisis.
5-26-2011 @ 6:59PM
Tara said...They re not raising this child in "freedom." They are raising (it) in a prison of secrets! How stressful! How awful! And the kid's a boy -- it is apparent from his face. Just sayin'.
5-26-2011 @ 9:15PM
KHC said...My first thought was the child might be a hermaphrodite. There have been controversies that parents chose the wrong sex before the child was able to choose.
5-26-2011 @ 8:04PM
cm724 said...I think it's hilarious that so many people care about this story and are going so far as to say that these parents have mental issues, and that they can't believe that these are the kinds of people that will someday run our country.
In America, we grow up socialized to believe that genders should act one way or another. Gender is a SOCIAL concept. In a study done once, a baby was put in a blue outfit and people automatically talked to the baby different (with a lowered voice and using words such as "you're such a big boy", etc) compared to when the baby was put in a pink outfit (e.g. their voice was raised and they commented on cuteness). I think it's great that these parents don't want their child to be socialized into thinking a certain way. Storm can grow up to feel however he or she wants to.
5-26-2011 @ 7:26PM
Louie Legend said...this aint even worth being news these are the type of parents that are not going to disapline there child and sadly there white i didnt see that coming wink wink !!!
5-26-2011 @ 7:37PM
Darcey said...To the parents:
If you don't want to share the baby's gender with the world . . . keep it to yourself instead of broadcasting it! How much have you cashed in on this pathetic attempt at your "15 minutes of fame" at your child's expense?
5-26-2011 @ 7:49PM
Wish I was a mom said...Did anyone stop to think for a moment that maybe this child was born a hermaphrodite? Maybe the child was born with both sexual organs. Maybe the parents don't want to assign a gener role to the child because they are afraid of making the wrong decision! There are so many instances when hermaphrodite's are "assigned" a gender role by their family only to turn out the complete opposite as they grow up. Whatever the reason is that the parents have decided not to announce the gender of the child is nobody's business.
5-26-2011 @ 7:45PM
D. Ressler said...When this article mentions studies that show what people do, it does not list this entire range of what people do, but only general trends. Example: "Other studies have shown that when people observe a crying baby and are told it is a girl, the child is labeled 'sad.' When told the baby is a boy, however, observers find the baby 'angry.'" This does not mean that ALL people had that response. This does not list all the variety of responses given by the observers in interpreting the cries. Hence, we cannot assume Storm's parents will behave with some gender specific response. Who writes these stories which attempt to lead readers to conclusions that cannot be reached based on the cited studies?
Anyway, I'm sure Storm has a wonderful loving family, capable of making the right decisions for their own family at the right times. Better than those who masquerade their repression of women under the guise of "Family Values".
5-26-2011 @ 7:47PM
bellered said...Why in the world does anyone care?
When our daughter was born, we tried to be gender neutral with her in the sense that we didn't encourage her to play with "girl" toys, or discourage her from playing with "boy" toys, and none of it seemed to matter. She wasn't, like, "dress all in pink and play with nothing but dolls", or any other stereotype, but she definitely played and behaved in a completely different manner from our son, born 5 years later. She didn't dig action figures, and was more apt to play in a more "constructive" fashion, while the boy has always liked to blow stuff up. We didn't do anything extreme, like try to hide gender identity, but what little we did didn't really seem to matter much or have any real effect.
Still, who cares what these parents do? They're not tying the kid down and beating it, they're not mutilating its body (doing some kind of surgery, or something), they're just not telling the kid or anyone else what gender the kid is. Obviously, that ain't gonna last forever, and as soon as the kid can walk, talk, and play with / be around other kids, that kid is gonna know what (s)he is.
So, what's the big deal? Are we so lacking in things to deal with at home, we need to take an interest in the lives of other people now?
5-27-2011 @ 11:37AM
NativeGirl said...Native Americans used to do the same thing to their children. Except when the child was old enough, about three, when they felt a gender would be taken, the decision was up to the child. The way they would have them decide would be to put a toy hammer/hatchet and a doll in a teepee with the child then cause the teepee to be "on fire". The child was never in any real danger mind you, just a lil smoke and mirrors if you will, the child reacting to the "fire" would grab what they felt was more of value to them and retreat. It didn't matter if the child's sex was boy or girl, it matter what they took. If they took a doll, they would be given roles in the tribe that was female gender specific and vice versa. I think it is clever in our current society to try such a move because it is allowing the child to decide. Often we confuse sex with gender but in reality, both are different. Perhaps if more parents would be willing to be this vague about gender, letting the child decide, perhaps then less children who are different in sex from their gender roles will feel more comfortable in their own skin instead of hiding from it. God Bless.
5-26-2011 @ 8:37PM
Dale said...Why is this crazy? I think it's a GREAT idea!!!! I'm doing the same thing when I have kids! I've been planning on it for years!! Personally, I'm sick and tired of people judging others simply by what's between their legs!!!!
5-26-2011 @ 9:39PM
Lindsey said...I don't see anything wrong with it, I actually find it a fascinating social experiment. Imagine how different you may have been had you not had dolls thrown in your face if you were a girl and a football if you were a boy?
5-26-2011 @ 8:07PM
rmw said...Just when you though people where smarter, they go and complain about a family doing a good thing.
People need to get up and realize gender is far more complicated than xy/xx
5-26-2011 @ 9:00PM
Carmine said...Granted:::: just when you think people can't gtet any crazier, just book in here and read some of these comments...lol
5-26-2011 @ 8:18PM
GW said...I love this!! Grow up to be who you are without socialized gender constraint. Love dolls, hate cooking, love mechanical things but hate math. BE what and who you are without the influence of commercialization, gender socialization or a "color scheme" that defines you. Kudos to the parents who OBVIOUSLY love the child as she/he is born, not what society says they should be. I love the baby already!
5-26-2011 @ 8:39PM
Anne said...They're all kooks especially that Cheryl Kilodavis that are further encouraging their kid's confusion by trying to appear as the most tolerant people. That kind of so called tolerance does not equal intelligense and lacks common sense
5-26-2011 @ 9:36PM
KC said...My grandmother bought me dolls. I preferred to play with my cousins' toy cars and my uncle's electric trains. End result, a perfectly normal hetero woman, with sufficient mechanical skills to do my own home repairs.
5-26-2011 @ 11:00PM
Fay said...The family should be evaluated before they mess up three children. Social Services......
5-26-2011 @ 11:59PM
Kary said...Not really possible to drastically change the child's outlook on life considering people, whether they mean to or not, do gender stereotype and since his/her own family know his/her gender, they are going to do this whether they mean to or not, to some extent. Also, the child will have hormones and gender body parts to contend with. I'm all for open mindedness and accepting people for who they are, but this could also backfire and create identity problems where there needn't be any.
5-26-2011 @ 11:01PM
J said...These people are nuts! Really, who are they kidding...