Fight Fat Even in Toddlers, Report Warns
Filed under: In The News, Nutrition: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Research Reveals: Toddlers & Preschoolers
Credit: Keith Brofsky, Getty
That's a growing problem: Already, one in five preschoolers - 2- to 5-year-olds - is overweight or obese.
Topping the list of proposed changes: better guidelines to help parents and caregivers know just how much toddlers should eat as they move from baby food to bigger-kid fare. And making sure preschoolers get at least 15 minutes of physical activity for every hour they spend in child care.
Thursday's recommendations, from the Institute of Medicine, aren't about putting the very young on diets. But those early pounds can lead to lasting bad effects on their health as children grow, says the report.
"It's a huge opportunity to instill good habits at a time when you don't have to change old ones," said Leann Birch, director of Pennsylvania State University's Center for Childhood Obesity Research, who chaired the IOM panel.
Consider: Babies drink milk until they're full and then turn away. But children as young as 2 or 3 are sensitive to portion size, important in not inadvertently training them to overeat.
"If you give them larger portions, they eat more," Birch explained.
Pediatricians generally give pretty explicit directions on how to feed babies. And the nation's dietary guidelines include a special section for preschoolers, including information that a portion size generally is about 1 tablespoon of each food type per year of age.
But overall, those national guidelines are aimed at ages 2 and older - though surveys show even very young children eat too few of the fruits and vegetables they need. So the institute called on the government to create consumer-friendly dietary guidelines for birth to age 2.
That would capture the "dramatic dietary transition that occurs, from consuming one single food to, by the time they're 2, ordering up things from McDonald's and, we hope, having also learned to eat a lot of healthy foods," Birch said.
That will be part of the discussion during the next dietary guidelines update in 2015, said Robert Post, deputy director of the Agriculture Department's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, which oversees that process. But developing guidelines for these younger children is complex because their nutrition needs are based in part on developmental stage, he cautioned.
Of course, parents have the biggest influence over whether healthy eating and being active become a child's norm.
But the report makes the case that children's habits are influenced by far more than their parents - and thus it's time to expand obesity prevention to more of the other places youngsters spend time. For example, nearly three-fourths of children ages 2 to 5 spend at least part of their day in some form of child care.
Among the recommendations:
-Day care and preschool operators should be trained in proper physical activity for young children, provide at least 15 minutes of it per hour, and avoid withholding physical activity as a punishment.
-Child care regulations should limit how long toddlers and preschoolers sit or stand still to no more than 30 minutes at a time - and limit holding babies in swings, bouncy seats or other equipment while they're awake.
-Day care and preschools should practice what's called responsive feeding: providing age-appropriate portion sizes, teaching children to serve themselves properly, requiring adults to sit with and eat the same foods as the children and following babies' cues as to when they've had enough.
-Breastfed infants are less likely to become obese later in childhood, so doctors and hospitals should encourage breastfeeding and limit formula samples aimed at new moms.
-At checkups, doctors should consider the parents' weight in assessing which children are at risk of later obesity, and then alert parents early that preventive steps are needed. About 10 percent of infants and toddlers already weigh too much for their length.
-To increase healthful eating among the poorest children, the government should take steps to get more families who are eligible for federal nutrition-assistance programs to sign up.
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. This article was written by Lauran Neergaard, Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
Want to get the latest ParentDish news and advice? Sign up for our newsletter!











ReaderComments (Page 2 of 2)
6-24-2011 @ 5:29PM
Joe said...Stupid. Half of my skinny friends were fat babies, and most of my fat friends were skinny babies. This fat obsession in America needs to end.
Reply
6-24-2011 @ 5:30PM
Joe said...P.S. While this will come as a shock to some people, there is more than one body type in this world and more than one type of build.
6-24-2011 @ 6:02PM
Jenn said...UGH! Restricting a child under the age of two goes completely AGAINST what the AAP stands adamently on. Under the age of two you don't calorie restrict a baby. There is absolutely no data to back up that an under-2 needs portion control. Nope, no way, the brain does not have an override for eating when not hungry before the age of 2. An under-2 is full, they stop eating.
The only valid recommendation they can make in this regard is to go after crappy food for the under-2 group. Need to cover the food groups and lots of variety. No junk food, no processed food, no white breads and sugars. No 2 year old needs to know what soda and cheetos are. That is the only valid point they could make with this argument.
The slimmest people in my family from the age of 2 to 65 were the fattest, rolliest, 5 creases per arm fat fat babies you have ever seen in a picture. They are all slim and petite people now. My mother was the fattest of all and that was living in a war zone. It's called GENES and is perfectly normal and healthy for our family.
Reply
6-24-2011 @ 6:07PM
pat said...A reply to the person that said more people should get food stamps or whatever they are called now......I would not object to this if they really used it for FOOD. It makes me furious to see a person pay for colas, candy, potato chips etc with their food cards. They don't allow them to buy bath soap, laundry detergent etc, (for good hygiene ) so why would they allow them to buy JUNK.
Reply
6-24-2011 @ 6:20PM
Ryan said..."Contrary to popular belief, children don't usually outgrow their baby fat"... That's a blatant fabrication. There's a reason it's called baby fat. This article is written in a way that makes it dangerous to under-educated parents. It doesn't talk nearly enough about eating healthily, in terms of types of food, and seems to suggest putting a 2 year old on a portion controlled diet... how's that sound for stunted growth?
Reply
6-24-2011 @ 6:35PM
Jean said...It's all about activity. Kids do not get enough active playtime. My son was a chubby baby and he did outgrow it by the time he was about 4. He lost it gradually as he was growing and I suspect most babies do lose their baby fat. Here's another story that will cause needless worry in new parents especailly. Love these little chubby babies and enjoy them.
Reply
6-24-2011 @ 7:16PM
Jane said...I took my daughter for her check up when she was 2 and there was a family there...mom, dad and their 2-year-old, who was getting a check up.
All three were so fat, the 2-year-old was waddling back and forth like a penguin because she was so fat. I never saw a child so young, so fat. The nurse lectured the parents for it. Obviously, when they're so fat themselves, they don't care about the baby.
It was really sad. That was 14 years ago so I can imagine what that kid looks like now.
Reply
6-24-2011 @ 7:33PM
K Bakke said...I have 3 kids and 5 grand daughters. They were all between 7 and 8 lbs at birth. And as teens my kids were all different weights and sizes. One was 4'11' and 130 lbs at 13 years. One was 5'3"tall and 109 lbs at the same age. And my son was 5'11' and 185lbs at 13. They ate the same way and very health, and rarely fast food. However as babies I feed them the way I was raised by my mother the mom of 8 kids. However in today's age even as poor couldn't really afford HEALTHY FOOD, it is too high priced. The only affordable food is sugery/fatty crap, thus you have heavy children. Start making the GOOD food affordable and the CRAP high priced and then you will have more healthy children.
Reply
6-24-2011 @ 11:27PM
jean said...i thought i just listened to the results of a study on the news just yesterday that concluded that many chubby babies went on to be star high school athletes. really, people..... would you really try to starve your children? lack of nutrition may be why there is so much "autism" today. they have pretty much ruled out your latest obsession with vaccines, so this may be the next thing you can obsess about. grab ahold of it and run with it!
Reply
6-25-2011 @ 10:24AM
sherinoga said...Our culture as a whole has become overly indulgent, so it is no surprise to read that babies and toddlers are following the trend toward excessive weight. I've had wonderful, well-intended parents in my practice not realize that giving their children adult size portions of food was inappropriate. Overeating has become normal; we have lost our gauge of what is appropriate eating, even for children.
Sheri Noga MA
Author of "Have the Guts to Do it Right: Raising Grateful and Responsible Children in an Era of Indulgence"
Reply
6-26-2011 @ 5:54PM
Tom Ewer said...This is so sad to see...but I can't say I am surprised.
Reply
7-03-2011 @ 10:00AM
Heather said...My daughter was a very fat baby, now at 19 she is 5'9" and 120lbs, my son was over 8lbs at birth and is now a skinny 8 yr old. These studies are such a waste of time and money.
Reply