Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Caron Gremont: Obesity's Officially a Disease, So How Come My Child…
Karri-Leigh P. Mastrangelo: Am I Going to Hell For My Position on…
States Consider Banning Teens From Tanning Beds
Filed under: In The News, Health & Safety: Teens, Health
Citing skin cancer risks, legislators have debated over whether or not states should ban tanning beds used by minors. Credit: AP
Citing skin cancer risks, legislators have joined lawmakers in at least 21 other states who have debated bills this year to ban or restrict tanning bed use by minors.
Teens under the age of 14 are already banned from tanning beds in California, and older teens need parental permission. But lawmakers in the Golden State are considering banning anyone under age 18 from using tanning beds, even if a parent says it's OK.
Sen. Ted Lieu, who proposed the more stringent legislation, says the parent signatures on permission forms are often forged, and tanning salons benefit financially by looking the other way. The bill has been approved by the Senate and faces review by the Assembly policy committee Tuesday.
Lieu chides vain teens who make a habit of slipping into tanning beds, saying they're short-sighted because "you will age doing this. Your skin will look more leathery later on."
According to the Food and Drug Administration, exposure to UV radiation, whether from the sun or a tanning bed, can cause skin cancer, burns, premature skin aging and eye damage. Approximately 30 million Americans visit tanning salons every year, and 2.3 million of those are teens, the FDA says.
"There is no such thing as a safe tan," according to the agency. "The increase in skin pigment, called melanin, which causes the tan color change in your skin is a sign of damage."
In 2009, a World Health Organization research group classified UV-emitting tanning beds as "carcinogenic," adding that health officials should strongly consider restricting minors' access to sunbeds. WHO, the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Dermatology all support legislation banning the use of sunbeds and lamps for teens younger than 18.
Tanning businesses across the country are feeling the heat.
Along with California, lawmakers in New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania are considering banning tanning beds for people under age 18. Similar legislation failed this year in Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota and New Mexico.
Legislators in Massachusetts are considering a ban for teens under 14 or 16 in two separate bills. Lawmakers in Florida, Kentucky, Vermont and Washington rejected such measures this year.
John Overstreet, a spokesman for the Indoor Tanning Association, said sunscreen sellers are behind the legislative push and tanning beds are not proven to cause melanoma, the most deadly type of skin cancer.
California's bill is sponsored by the state's dermatology association and a cancer research group called AIM at Melanoma, which lists major drug companies, including Pfizer Inc. and Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., as its sponsors.
Overstreet said business owners in his trade group worry that the legislation would hurt small businesses already struggling in the current economy. There are now about 878 tanning businesses in California, a number that's seen a 24 percent drop since 2009 because business has cooled, he said.
In areas where teens do a lot of tanning like college towns or affluent areas, Overstreet said, the legislation could mean a 10 percent hit to tanning salons' income.
"UV tanning is by far what people want," said Overstreet, saying tanning is a personal choice that shouldn't be interfered with by government.
"Tanning lamps and beds are designed to mimic the noontime sun, and you use them a measured amount of time," he said.
But according to American Academy of Pediatrics, powerful tanning beds produce radiation levels up to "10 to 15 times higher than that of the midday sun" and frequent tanners get a level of radiation that is not found in nature.
More than a million cases of skin cancer were diagnosed in the U.S. last year, according to the American Academy of Dermatology.
Cancer survivor Lisa Andrews, 41, said she shouldn't have trusted tanning salon salespeople for medical advice. As a teenager, she went in for tanning bed stints one to three times a week in the winter months.
"I've always lived in California, and I wanted to have the blond hair and the brown skin and live up to all that California girl stuff," said Andrews, who now protects her naturally pale skin with religious use of sunscreen. "I remember thinking I was so ugly when I was my own skin color."
At age 35, she was diagnosed with a malignant melanoma on her leg, and she is now vigilant about watching her skin for signs of cancer. She attributes the cancer to her time in the tanning bed, which she also came to rely on for the euphoric buzz she would feel after the experience.
Exposure to UV rays from tanning beds or the sun may be addictive because the radiation may cause release of endorphins in the skin, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics.
For the past five years, Long Beach resident Samantha Healey has slipped into a tanning bed up to four times a week.
"I almost get, like, re-energized," the 23-year-old said.
Healey has worked in tanning salons in California and Nevada and says rebellious teens do try to forge their parents' signatures.
Wayne LaVassar, who owns 14 tanning salons in the Los Angeles area, says he requires parents to come in to sign permission slips at his California Tanning Salons. Requiring in-person authorization would be an appropriate middle ground instead of a ban, he said.
Missouri lawmakers are considering a bill this year that would require parents to sign off on their children's tanning, but similar measures failed in Connecticut, Nevada, South Dakota and West Virginia.
In North Carolina, Ohio and Rhode Island, legislators are weighing whether a doctor's note should be required for teens under 18. Iowa and Washington rejected such a requirement this year.
LaVassar said he doesn't understand why legislation is moving in so many states when tanning beds are overseen by the FDA and parents should have the right to make decisions for their kids.
"I don't believe the sun is bad for you. I believe too much sun is bad for you," he said. "We should be sending a message of moderation and responsibility."
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. This article was written by SHAYA TAYEFE MOHAJER, Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
Want to get the latest ParentDish news and advice? Sign up for our newsletter!
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- Does the dc superior court represent the irs in a civil filing or does the irs have attorneys?
- Is permission required from both parents in every state . to become a foster parent? are there name's changed; would i need a court order
- While attempting to explain consider who your explaining to. building a government may seem like gilligan's island to a person that can't











ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
6-28-2011 @ 11:04AM
Newmomma said...As much as I don't agree with teens and adults using tanning beds it truly is none of our business.
Reply
6-28-2011 @ 1:18PM
dougalcandy said...My daughter developed a very weird autoimmune skin issue a couple of years ago. Couldn't find any reason for it. The doctor was going to put her on some drug that is given to cancer patients which would p[robably have had side effects. My sister the nurse suggested she go to a tanning salon. Worked like a charm, the skin issue never returned.
Reply
6-28-2011 @ 1:57PM
Michelle said...I agree there should be an age requirement for tanning. We know so much now about how too much sun and UV rays can affect our health, why would any parent say it's okay for their child to damage their skin just to have a "glow", which is really just skin damage anyway? I am a perfect example of tanning gone wrong. I drenched myself in baby oil and sunned myself several times as a teenager, looking like a lobster afterwards, not to mention the pain of a bad sunburn I endured just to get a tan. Then at prom time as a senior I tanned a handful of times, again my fair skin looking more than rosy than bronze as I left the tanning salon. Then in college I got a discount with my school ID to a tanning place, and I went there once or twice a week for 3-4 months. Nothing too extensive, I thought; but you know what dermatologists say, all it takes is one good burn... Fast forward 25 years, I haven't tanned in almost 20 of those - it happened. The dreaded dark mole on my thigh - and yes, it was melanoma -- cancer. I made it to the dermatologist just in time, if it would have grown any deeper I would have had to have my lymph nodes removed and the cancer might have spread. I have to be very careful now and have mole checks every three months; already I see other moles that are popping up or changing. My previously beautiful German and Ukrainian skin is not only damaged but diseased. My daughters know they need to wear sunscreen outdoors and they can be outside for extended periods, but they will never be allowed to purposely sunbathe to get a tan, at least while they live with me. Hopefully I can save their young skin from being damaged like mine is. We need to tell our children to embrace their skin, whatever the color - it's part of their heritage. Teens should not be able to just walk into a salon and tan. Kids are superficial at that age, so if they are allowed to do something to make them look more appealing and acceptable according to society's standards, they will do it! It's our jobs as parents to make sure they make good decisions, and healthy ones. And like the author said, sun exposure isn't bad, just too much of it is.
Reply